Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2719
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers
Peer Review Status: Unrefereed
Title: How Does the Institutional Setting for Creditor Rights Affect Bank Lending and Risk-Taking?
Author(s): Zhao, Tianshu
Murinde, Victor
Mlambo, Kupukile
Contact Email: tianshu.zhao@stir.ac.uk
Citation: Zhao T, Murinde V & Mlambo K (2011) How Does the Institutional Setting for Creditor Rights Affect Bank Lending and Risk-Taking?. Stirling Economics Discussion Paper, 2011-03.
Keywords: Creditor rights
Law enforcement
Information sharing
Bank lending
Bank risk-taking
Africa
Nigeria Economic conditions.
Competition, International
JEL Code(s): D23: Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
G21: Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
G28: Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation
G32: Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
K10: Basic Areas of Law: General (Constitutional Law)
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
Issue Date: 1-Feb-2011
Date Deposited: 14-Feb-2011
Series/Report no.: Stirling Economics Discussion Paper, 2011-03
Abstract: This paper investigates how the institutional setting for protection of creditor rights affects bank lending and risk-taking. An analytical model is specified to underpin banks‟ portfolio decisions, between loans and other earning assets such as government securities. The model is augmented with various metrics, which proxy the institutional setting for creditor rights, and is estimated and tested on an unbalanced three-dimensional dataset of commercial banks in 20 African countries for 1995-2008. It is found that three specific metrics induce banks to allocate a high proportion of their earning assets to loans: legal creditor rights; the efficient enforcement of creditor rights; and availability of information sharing mechanisms among banks. However, the three metrics appear to work through different channels. The enforceability of legal rights works not only through mitigating credit risks, but also through a composite effect of market competition and lower costs of information acquisition and contract enforcement. The legal rights metric and information sharing metric exclusively rely on the composite effect.
Type: Working Paper
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2719
Affiliation: Economics
University of Birmingham
African Development Bank Group

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SEDP-2011-03-Zhao-Murinde-Mlambo.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version750.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.