Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27133
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNewell, Annaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKeane, Jenniferen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Brianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHeary, Carolineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcDarby, Vincenten_UK
dc.contributor.authorDudley, Bernieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Joshen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Kadyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-14T23:01:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-14T23:01:28Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27133-
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this research was twofold: to explore 1) the efficacy of active vs. passive distraction on self-reported pain and distress of children during a venepuncture; and 2) the impact ofparental psychoeducation on child and parent outcomes, parental knowledge of distraction procedures and parental engagement in effective pain management strategies.  Methods This cross-sectional study included 213 children scheduled for a venepuncture, and one of their parents, who were randomly allocated to one of four conditions; interactive distraction, passive distraction, interactive distraction with parent psychoeducation and passive distraction with parent psychoeducation. ANCOVA’s were used to investigate the impact of distraction type and the use of parent psychoeducation on child and parent pain related outcome variables.  Results Statistical analyses revealed no significant differences between groups for child-reported pain and distress. Parents who received parent psychoeducation had a significantly higher level of knowledge than parents who did not receive psychoeducation, but did not engage in more effective pain management behaviour.  Conclusions The results indicated that passive vs. active distraction does not have a significantly different influence on child pain-related outcome variables. In addition, while psychoeducation was demonstrated to be effective in increasing parental knowledge, it was not sufficient to change parental behaviour.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_UK
dc.relationNewell A, Keane J, McGuire B, Heary C, McDarby V, Dudley B, Moran J, Francis K & Caes L (2018) Interactive versus Passive Distraction and Parent Psychoeducation as pain management techniques during pediatric venepuncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Journal of Pain, 34 (11), pp. 1008-1016. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000628en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document accepted for publication in Journal of Pain by Wolters Kluwer. This version is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode). The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000628en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectVenepunctureen_UK
dc.subjectDistractionen_UK
dc.subjectParent Psychoeducationen_UK
dc.subjectPainen_UK
dc.subjectDistressen_UK
dc.titleInteractive versus Passive Distraction and Parent Psychoeducation as pain management techniques during pediatric venepuncture: A Randomized Controlled Trialen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-05-11en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[2nd resubmission to CJP_final.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AJP.0000000000000628en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29750665en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleClinical Journal of Painen_UK
dc.citation.issn1536-5409en_UK
dc.citation.issn0749-8047en_UK
dc.citation.volume34en_UK
dc.citation.issue11en_UK
dc.citation.spage1008en_UK
dc.citation.epage1016en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailline.caes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date10/05/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOur Lady’s Children’s Hospital (Crumlin)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationOur Lady’s Children’s Hospital (Crumlin)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNational University of Ireland - Galwayen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000447180100004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85054454586en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid894699en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-04-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-04-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-04-27en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNewell, Anna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKeane, Jennifer|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGuire, Brian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHeary, Caroline|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcDarby, Vincent|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDudley, Bernie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoran, Josh|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrancis, Kady|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-05-11en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2019-05-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2019-05-11|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename2nd resubmission to CJP_final.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0749-8047en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2nd resubmission to CJP_final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version309.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.