Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26747
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmbrose, Joseph Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWijeakumar, Sobanawartinyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBuss, Aaron Ten_UK
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, John Pen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-18T08:24:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-18T08:24:26Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-19en_UK
dc.identifier.other33en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26747-
dc.description.abstractVisual working memory (VWM) is a key cognitive system that enables people to hold visual information in mind after a stimulus has been removed and compare past and present to detect changes that have occurred. VWM is severely capacity limited to around 3–4 items, although there are robust individual differences in this limit. Importantly, these individual differences are evident in neural measures of VWM capacity. Here, we capitalized on recent work showing that capacity is lower for more complex stimulus dimension. In particular, we asked whether individual differences in capacity remain consistent if capacity is shifted by a more demanding task, and, further, whether the correspondence between behavioral and neural measures holds across a shift in VWM capacity. Participants completed a change detection (CD) task with simple colors and complex shapes in an fMRI experiment. As expected, capacity was significantly lower for the shape dimension. Moreover, there were robust individual differences in behavioral estimates of VWM capacity across dimensions. Similarly, participants with a stronger BOLD response for color also showed a strong neural response for shape within the lateral occipital cortex, intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and superior IPS. Although there were robust individual differences in the behavioral and neural measures, we found little evidence of systematic brain-behavior correlations across feature dimensions. This suggests that behavioral and neural measures of capacity provide different views onto the processes that underlie VWM and CD. Recent theoretical approaches that attempt to bridge between behavioral and neural measures are well positioned to address these findings in future work.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_UK
dc.relationAmbrose JP, Wijeakumar S, Buss AT & Spencer JP (2016) Feature-Based Change Detection Reveals Inconsistent Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10, Art. No.: 33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00033en_UK
dc.rights© 2016 Ambrose, Wijeakumar, Buss and Spencer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectchange detectionen_UK
dc.subjectfMRIen_UK
dc.subjectindividual differencesen_UK
dc.subjectvisual working memoryen_UK
dc.subjectworking memory capacityen_UK
dc.titleFeature-Based Change Detection Reveals Inconsistent Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnsys.2016.00033en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFrontiers in Systems Neuroscienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1662-5137en_UK
dc.citation.volume10en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date19/04/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Iowaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Tennesseeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of East Angliaen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84964797821en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid505647en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6931-4329en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-03-29en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-03-29en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-02-16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAmbrose, Joseph P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWijeakumar, Sobanawartiny|0000-0002-6931-4329en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBuss, Aaron T|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSpencer, John P|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-02-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-02-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamefnsys-10-00033.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1662-5137en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fnsys-10-00033.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.