Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26382
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGough, Lauraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWookey, Philipen_UK
dc.contributor.authorShaver, Gaius Ren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-20T01:56:12Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-20T01:56:12Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2002-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26382-
dc.description.abstractLong-term fertilization studies in several arctic ecosystems have demonstrated dramatic responses of plant community structure with concomitant changes in ecosystem properties. Although these results are well documented in moist tussock and wet sedge tundra, dry heath tundra has been less studied. In an Alaskan dry heath arctic tundra, we conducted a biomass harvest of plants that received additional nitrogen (N, 10 g m -2 yr-1) and/or phosphorus (P, 5 g m-2 yr-1) or reduced light (50% of ambient) for 8 yr. We expected responses to be similar to those of other arctic tundra communities with increased biomass resulting from added nutrients and species responding individualistically to generate the community-level response. However, total vascular biomass did not change in the dry heath tundra in response to any treatment, although individual species and functional group biomass differed from controls. Aboveground productivity, estimated using new apical growth, significantly increased in the N and N+P plots caused by significantly greater abundance of a tussock-forming grass, Hierochloe alpina. The lowest species richness was recorded in the N alone plots, where a deciduous shrub, Betula nana, had its greatest biomass, and richness also declined in N+P plots. Plots that received P alone had similar biomass and species richness to controls, although shrubs decreased in abundance. The shade treatment caused minor biomass differences, marginally less new apical growth, and slightly lower species richness compared to control plots. These results were similar to several ongoing studies in Alaskan moist tussock and wet sedge tundras where above-ground productivity increased in response to added N and/or P but biomass response lagged. This shift in the dry heath tundra from an evergreen shrub to a grass dominated system in the N and N+P plots may cause profound ecosystem function changes as woody biomass capable of long-term carbon storage is lost.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherINSTAAR, University of Coloradoen_UK
dc.relationGough L, Wookey P & Shaver GR (2002) Dry heath arctic tundra responses to long-term nutrient and light manipulation. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 34 (2), pp. 211-218. https://doi.org/10.2307/1552473en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has not responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleDry heath arctic tundra responses to long-term nutrient and light manipulationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[1552473.pdf] The publisher has not responded to our queries. This work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/1552473en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleArctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1938-4246en_UK
dc.citation.issn1523-0430en_UK
dc.citation.volume34en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage211en_UK
dc.citation.epage218en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailphilip.wookey1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMarine Biological Laboratoryen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMarine Biological Laboratoryen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000176962800011en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid524118en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5957-6424en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2002-05-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-12-19en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGough, Laura|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWookey, Philip|0000-0001-5957-6424en_UK
local.rioxx.authorShaver, Gaius R|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1552473.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1523-0430en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1552473.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.3 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.