Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Alec-
dc.contributor.authorAdler, Amanda I-
dc.contributor.authorBell, David-
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorBrouwer, Werner-
dc.contributor.authorClaxton, Karl-
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Alastair-
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Peter G-
dc.contributor.authorvan, Baal Pieter-
dc.description.abstractIn this editorial, we consider the vexing issue of ‘unrelated future costs’ (for example, the costs of caring for people with dementia or kidney failure after preventing their deaths from a heart attack). The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance isnotto take such costs into account in technology appraisals. However, standard appraisal practice involves modelling the benefits of those unrelated technologies. We argue that there is a sound principled reason for including both the costs and benefits of unrelated care. Changing this practice would have material consequences for decisions about reimbursing particular technologies, and we urge future research to understand this better.en_UK
dc.relationMorton A, Adler AI, Bell D, Briggs A, Brouwer W, Claxton K, Craig N, Fischer A, McGregor PG & van Baal P (2016) Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal (Editorial), Health Economics, 25 (8), pp. 933-938.-
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Morton, A., Adler, A. I., Bell, D., Briggs, A., Brouwer, W., Claxton, K., Craig, N., Fischer, A., McGregor, P., and van Baal, P. (2016) Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. Health Econ., 25: 933–938, which has been published in final form at This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.-
dc.subjecthealth technology assessmenten_UK
dc.subjecteconomic analysisen_UK
dc.subjectcost effectiveness analysisen_UK
dc.subjectunrelated future costsen_UK
dc.titleUnrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal (Editorial)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHealth Economics-
dc.type.statusPost-print (author final draft post-refereeing)-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclyde-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridge-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgow-
dc.contributor.affiliationErasmus University, Rotterdam-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of York-
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Health Scotland-
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's University Hospitals NHS-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclyde-
dc.contributor.affiliationErasmus University, Rotterdam-
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Morton_etal_HE_2016_Reflections_on_NICE_guidance_to_the_methods_of_technology_appraisal.pdf218.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.