Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26105
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Roslyn Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Stephen C Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWatts, Kevinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAtkinson, Nicken_UK
dc.contributor.authorTravis, Justin M Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-19T00:16:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-19T00:16:05Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26105-
dc.description.abstractTrees along linear features are important landscape features, and their loss threatens ecological connectivity. Until recently, trees outside of woodlands (TOWs) were largely unmapped however; the development of innovation mapping techniques provides opportunities to understand the distribution of such trees and to apply spatially explicit models to explore the importance of trees for connectivity. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of models when investigating tree loss and impacts on connectivity. Specifically, we investigated the consequences of tree loss due to the removal of roadside trees, a common management response for diseased or damaged trees, on wider landscape functional connectivity. We simulated the loss of roadside trees within six focal areas of the south east of the UK. We used a spatially explicit individual-based modelling platform, RangeShifter, to model the movement of 81 hypothetical actively dispersing woodland breeding species across these agriculturally fragmented landscapes. We investigated the extent to which removal of trees, from roadsides within the wider landscape, affected the total number of successful dispersers in any given year and the number of breeding woodlands that became isolated through time. On average roadside trees accounted for <2% of land cover, but removing 60% of them (~1.2% of land cover) nevertheless decreased the number of successful dispersers by up to 17%. The impact was greatest when roadside trees represented a greater proportion of canopy cover. The study therefore demonstrates that models such as RangeShifter can provide valuable tools for assessing the consequences of losing trees outside of woodlands.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationHenry RC, Palmer SCF, Watts K, Mitchell R, Atkinson N & Travis JMJ (2017) Tree loss impacts on ecological connectivity: Developing models for assessment. Ecological Informatics, 42, pp. 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.010en_UK
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Under a Creative Commons license (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectConnectivityen_UK
dc.subjectTree diseaseen_UK
dc.subjectTree mortalityen_UK
dc.subjectModellingen_UK
dc.subjectRangeShifteren_UK
dc.subjectScattered treesen_UK
dc.subjectCorridorsen_UK
dc.titleTree loss impacts on ecological connectivity: Developing models for assessmenten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.010en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcological Informaticsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1574-9541en_UK
dc.citation.volume42en_UK
dc.citation.spage90en_UK
dc.citation.epage99en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date19/10/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe James Hutton Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationThe Woodland Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000418985600011en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85032010923en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid512519en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-10-18en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-10-18en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-11-08en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHenry, Roslyn C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPalmer, Stephen C F|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWatts, Kevin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMitchell, Ruth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAtkinson, Nick|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTravis, Justin M J|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-11-08en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2017-11-08|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S157495411730211X-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1574-9541en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S157495411730211X-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.