Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26054
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Attitudes towards the use of insect-derived materials in Scottish salmon feeds
Author(s): Popoff, Marine
MacLeod, Michael
Leschen, William
Keywords: aquaculture
Atlantic salmon
insect-meal
consumer research
Scotland
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: Popoff M, MacLeod M & Leschen W (2017) Attitudes towards the use of insect-derived materials in Scottish salmon feeds, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 3 (2), pp. 131-138.
Abstract: Fishmeal is an important source of high quality protein in aquaculture, but concerns about its cost and sustainability are making it a less attractive feed material. Replacing fishmeal with plant proteins can impact on the nutritional quality of farmed salmon. In theory insect meals could be substituted for fishmeal without affecting the quality of the fish produced. They could also provide a way of adding value to the bio-wastes used to rear the insects. However little is known about consumer or producer attitudes towards the use of insect meals. This paper reports findings of a survey of consumer attitudes in the UK, towards the incorporation of cultured insect larvae (maggots) – derived feed materials into commercial formulated fish feeds for the Scottish salmon farming sector. It provides results of investigations on the attitudes of other stakeholders (salmon farmers, feed producers and fish retailers) via semi-structured interviews. Consumer attitudes towards the use of insect meal were found to be favourable (only 10% were opposed to the inclusion of insect meal in salmon feed; n=180), with vegetable waste being the preferred waste stream for rearing insects. The interviews suggest that feed and salmon producers are in principle open to the use of insect meals, provided the feeds are proven to be safe and reliable. However producing insect meal in sufficient quantity, quality and at a price that is competitive with existing feed materials will be challenging. In conclusion, a large part of the population is uninformed, or misinformed, about the benefits of insect-feed. Because people tend to know very little about feeds and their impact on the environment, they generally have no strong opinions about the subject, and purchasing decisions are guided by other factors. More information may increase awareness and likelihood that people will accept Insect-based feeds.
DOI Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2016.0032
Rights: ©Wageningen Academic Publishers 2017 Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. The original publication is available at https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2016.0032

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
11301.pdf547.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.