Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26042
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Parents who catastrophize about their child's pain prioritize attempts to control pain
Author(s): Caes, Line
Vervoort, Tine
Eccleston, Christopher
Goubert, Liesbet
Contact Email: line.caes@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: Aug-2012
Date Deposited: 25-Oct-2017
Citation: Caes L, Vervoort T, Eccleston C & Goubert L (2012) Parents who catastrophize about their child's pain prioritize attempts to control pain. Pain, 153 (8), pp. 1695-1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.04.028
Abstract: How parents respond to their child in pain is critically important to how both parent and child attempt to cope with pain. We examined the influence of parental catastrophic thinking about child pain on their prioritization for pain control. Using a vignette methodology, parents reported, in response to different pain scenarios, on their imagined motivation for 2 competing goals: to control their child's pain (ie, pain control) or to encourage their child's participation in daily activities (ie, activity engagement). The effects of parent gender, pain intensity, and duration on parental goal priority were also explored. Findings indicated that higher levels of parental catastrophic thoughts were associated with the parents prioritizing child pain control over activity engagement. This effect was significantly moderated by pain duration. Specifically, pain control was more of a priority for those high in catastrophic thinking when the pain was more acute. In contrast, parental catastrophic thoughts had no effect on the pain control strategy favored by parents in situations with longer-lasting pain. Furthermore, independently of parental catastrophic thoughts, heightened priority for pain control was observed in highly intense and chronic pain situations. Moreover, in highly intense pain, priority for pain control was stronger for mothers compared with fathers. Theoretical and clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed. © 2012 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.04.028
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
00006396-201208000-00024.pdfFulltext - Published Version301.84 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.