|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Taboo trade-off aversion: a discrete choice model and empirical analysis (Forthcoming/Available Online)|
|Citation:||Chorus C, Pudane B, Mouter N & Campbell D (2017) Taboo trade-off aversion: a discrete choice model and empirical analysis (Forthcoming/Available Online), Journal of Choice Modelling. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534517300684; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2017.09.002.|
|Abstract:||An influential body of literature in moral psychology suggests that decision makers consider trade-offs morally problematic, or taboo, when the attributes traded off against each other belong to different ‘spheres’, such as friendship versus market transactions. This study is the first to model and empirically explore taboo trade-off aversion in a discrete choice context. To capture possible taboo trade-off aversion, we propose to extend the conventional linear in parameters logit model by including penalties for taboo trade-offs. Using this model, we then explore the presence (and size) of taboo trade-off aversion in a data set specifically collected for this purpose. Results, based on estimation of a variety of (Mixed) Logit models with and without taboo trade-off penalties, suggest that there is indeed a significant and sizeable taboo trade-off aversion underlying choice behaviour of respondents.|
|Rights:||© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/).|
|1-s2.0-S1755534517300684-main.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||989.3 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.