Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25873
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Lucindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Sallieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kirstyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-10T04:03:57Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-10T04:03:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11-15en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25873-
dc.description.abstractMoths are a vital ecosystem component and are currently undergoing extensive and severe declines across multiple species, partly attributed to habitat alteration. Although most remaining forest cover in Europe consists of intensively managed plantation woodlands, no studies have examined the influence of management practices on moth communities within plantations. Here, we aimed to determine: (1) how species richness, abundance, diversity of macro and micro moths in commercial conifer plantations respond to management at multiple spatial scales; (2) what the impacts of forest management practices on moth diversity are, and (3) how priority Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) species respond to management. BAP species were selected as they represent formerly widespread and common species, which have undergone substantial declines in the UK and Europe. We assessed moth communities in three conifer plantations in Northern England and Scotland by light trapping, combining local (e.g. age of planting) and landscape level (e.g. proximity to felled areas) characteristics to evaluate the impacts of forest management on moths. We found no relationship between local factors and moth richness, abundance and diversity but the amount of clear felling in the surrounding landscape had a strongly negative correlation. In contrast, the amount and proximity of broadleaf cover in the surrounding landscape positively influenced macro moth richness and abundance. For six BAP species, abundances were lower close to felled areas but increased with the size of adjacent broadleaf patches. We conclude that clear felling negatively affects moths, probably through alteration of habitats, the loss of larval host plants, and by limiting dispersal. A shift to continuous cover and maintaining broadleaf tree cover within plantations will greatly enhance their value for moth communities.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationKirkpatrick L, Bailey S & Park K (2017) Negative impacts of felling in exotic spruce plantations on moth diversity mitigated by remnants of deciduous tree cover. Forest Ecology and Management, 404, pp. 306-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.010en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Kirkpatrick L, Bailey S & Park K (2017) Negative impacts of felling in exotic spruce plantations on moth diversity mitigated by remnants of deciduous tree cover, Forest Ecology and Management, 404, pp. 306-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.010 © 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectMothen_UK
dc.subjectLepidopteraen_UK
dc.subjectAbundanceen_UK
dc.subjectSpecies richnessen_UK
dc.subjectPlantation managementen_UK
dc.subjectLandscape heterogeneityen_UK
dc.titleNegative impacts of felling in exotic spruce plantations on moth diversity mitigated by remnants of deciduous tree coveren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2018-09-12en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Landscape_impacts_on_lepidopteran_diversity_FINAL.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.010en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleForest Ecology and Managementen_UK
dc.citation.issn0378-1127en_UK
dc.citation.volume404en_UK
dc.citation.spage306en_UK
dc.citation.epage315en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailk.j.park@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date11/09/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationForest Enterprise Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000413384000030en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85029184771en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid519772en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6080-7197en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-09-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-09-14en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKirkpatrick, Lucinda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBailey, Sallie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPark, Kirsty|0000-0001-6080-7197en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-09-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2018-09-11en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2018-09-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameLandscape_impacts_on_lepidopteran_diversity_FINAL.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0378-1127en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Landscape_impacts_on_lepidopteran_diversity_FINAL.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version999.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.