Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2573
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMolloy, Gerarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Dianeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHamer, Marken_UK
dc.contributor.authorSniehotta, Falko Fen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-09T01:03:11Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-09T01:03:11Z-
dc.date.issued2010-11en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2573-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Social support for physical activity is reliably associated with regular physical activity, however the social cognitive processes, particularly post-intentional processes, that can explain this link have not been well characterised. In this study we examined the extent to which the relationship between social support for physical activity and subsequent physical activity can be accounted for by planning processes. Design & Method: The design was prospective observational and the sample consisted of 903 university students. Participants completed standard TPB, planning and physical activity measures at 2 time points, approximately 7 weeks apart. A gender stratified multiple mediation model was conducted to test the study hypotheses. Results: A significant interaction between social support and gender was observed. This indicated that lower levels of social support for physical activity were associated with lower levels of physical activity at time 2, for women only. In multiple mediation analysis this was partly explained by the indirect effects of social support through perceived behavioural control and coping planning. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of interpersonal processes in understanding the post-intentional determinants of regular physical activity. It is likely that planning processes relating to physical activity are often influenced by those in the ongoing immediate social environment who support this behaviour. Future development of theory and interventions should take account of the socially interactive nature of planning processes.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBritish Psychological Societyen_UK
dc.relationMolloy G, Dixon D, Hamer M & Sniehotta FF (2010) Social support and regular physical activity: Does planning mediate this link?. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15 (4), pp. 859-870. http://bpsoc.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjhp/2010/00000015/00000004/art00009; https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X490406en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in the British Journal of Health Psychology by the British Psychological Society.; Reproduced with permission from the British Journal of Health Psychology © The British Psychological Society 2010.en_UK
dc.subjectHealth Psychological aspectsen_UK
dc.subjectCognitive psychologyen_UK
dc.subjectPhysical education and trainingen_UK
dc.subjectSocial psychologyen_UK
dc.titleSocial support and regular physical activity: Does planning mediate this link?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2011-07-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[molloy et al BJHP 20101.pdf] Publisher conditions require a 6 month embargo.en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[molloy et al BJHP 2010.doc] Publisher conditions require a 6 month embargo.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1348/135910710X490406en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBritish Journal of Health Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-8287en_UK
dc.citation.issn1359-107Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume15en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage859en_UK
dc.citation.epage870en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://bpsoc.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjhp/2010/00000015/00000004/art00009en_UK
dc.author.emailg.j.molloy@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000284072600009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77958536942en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid811340en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-11-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2010-11-23en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMolloy, Gerard|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDixon, Diane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHamer, Mark|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSniehotta, Falko F|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2011-07-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2011-06-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2011-07-01|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamemolloy et al BJHP 20101.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount2en_UK
local.rioxx.source1359-107Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
molloy et al BJHP 20101.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version173.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
molloy et al BJHP 2010.docFulltext - Accepted Version224 kBUnknownView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.