Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Accounting and Finance Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The timing of new corporate debt issues and the risk-return tradeoff
Author(s): Koutmos, Dimitrios
Bozos, Konstantinos
Dionysiou, Dionysia
Lambertides, Neophytos
Contact Email:
Keywords: Debt announcements
risk-return tradeoff
bivariate EGARCH
Issue Date: May-2018
Date Deposited: 15-Jun-2017
Citation: Koutmos D, Bozos K, Dionysiou D & Lambertides N (2018) The timing of new corporate debt issues and the risk-return tradeoff. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 50 (4), pp. 943-978.
Abstract: The Modigliani-Miller theorem serves as the standard finance paradigm on corporate capital structure and managerial decision making. Implicitly, it is assumed that the market possesses full information about the firm. However, if firm managers have insider information, they may attempt to 'signal' changes in the firm’s financial structure and, in competitive equilibrium, shareholders will draw deductions from such signals. Empirical work shows that the value of underlying firms rises with leverage because investors expect such firms to implement positive NPV projects. We empirically examine this view using a sample of debt issue announcements by publicly traded firms listed on the London Stock Exchange. We argue that the timing of debt issues is fundamental in determining the relationship between leverage and risk-adjusted returns. We show that an announcing firm's intrinsic value may not rise depending on when management publicly 'signals' changes in their firm's capital structure. Specifically, we show that risk-adjusted returns rise positively for firms that make debt announcements during normal economic conditions while they tend to decline for firms making debt announcements during recessionary periods. During recessionary periods, market risk and loss aversion rise and investors focus less on the potential growth of debt announcing firms and focus more on potential losses instead. We conclude that the timing of new debt is of paramount importance and managers' inability to prudently time such announcements can lead to exacerbated levels of systematic risk coupled with a significant erosion in shareholder wealth.
DOI Link: 10.1007/s11156-017-0651-z
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository; The final publication is available at Springer via

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FINAL SUBMISSION June 2017.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version645.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.