Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25314
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Lucindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOldfield, Isobel Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kirstyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-26T22:48:18Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-26T22:48:18Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2017-07-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25314-
dc.description.abstractCommercial coniferous plantations are often assumed to be poor habitats for bats. As a result, the impact of forest management practices on bats, such as clear felling, has received little attention, particularly in Europe. However, there is growing evidence from multiple regions that bats do make use of plantation landscapes, and as interest in siting onshore wind turbines in upland conifer plantations grows, there is an urgent need to examine whether felling prior to turbine installation is likely to put foraging bats at risk of collision. In the first study of its kind, we use a “before – after – control – impact” study to explore the short-term impacts of clear fell harvest on bat activity in commercial plantations. Thirty-one mature stands of Sitka Spruce were surveyed using acoustic detectors in three large, upland Sitka Spruce plantations in Britain. Eleven stands were felled between 2013 and 2015, and 26 of the original 31 stands were resurveyed in 2015. The change in total bat activity and species- or genus-specific bat activity was modelled before and after felling occurred at both felled and control stands using generalised linear models. There was no change in overall bat activity at felled sites compared to control sites, but activity ofNyctalusspecies was 23 times higher following felling. TotalPipistrellus spp.activity doubled at felled sites post-harvesting, although this was mainly driven by increased activity at a few felled sites. WhenP. pygmaeusandP. pipistrelluswere considered separately, activity increased slightly but non-significantly. The size of the felled area influenced activity (for bats overall andPipistrellus spp.), with 90% higher activity in smaller felled stands (less than 5ha−1) compared to larger felled stands (greater than 30ha−1). ForP. pipistrellus, activity in felled areas decreased with the duration since harvesting; the greatest activity occurred in stands felled within two months compared to those harvested more than 16months previously. Higher activity for some groups following felling may occur due to the creation of more edge habitat, which is preferred by bothPipistrellusspecies we recorded. An increase in activity following the small-scale felling (‘key-holing’) required for the installation of turbines could put foraging bats at risk from collisions with turbines. Further investigation of the influence of both size of clear fell patch, timing of felling and changes in invertebrate abundance due to felling are required to establish the potential risk of key-holing and turbine installation to foraging bats.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationKirkpatrick L, Oldfield IF & Park K (2017) Responses of bats to clear fell harvesting in Sitka Spruce plantations, and implications for wind turbine installation. Forest Ecology and Management, 395, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.033en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Kirkpatrick L, Oldfield IF & Park K (2017) Responses of bats to clear fell harvesting in Sitka Spruce plantations, and implications for wind turbine installation, Forest Ecology and Management, 395, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.033 © 2017, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectConiferous plantationen_UK
dc.subjectManagementen_UK
dc.subjectBiodiversityen_UK
dc.subjectChiropteraen_UK
dc.subjectBatsen_UK
dc.subjectWind turbinesen_UK
dc.subjectClear fell harvestingen_UK
dc.titleResponses of bats to clear fell harvesting in Sitka Spruce plantations, and implications for wind turbine installationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2018-04-09en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Immediate responses of bats to clear fell harvesting_revised.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.033en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleForest Ecology and Managementen_UK
dc.citation.issn0378-1127en_UK
dc.citation.volume395en_UK
dc.citation.spage1en_UK
dc.citation.epage8en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailk.j.park@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date08/04/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Lincolnen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000401389600001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85017183108en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid530673en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6080-7197en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-03-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-05-08en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Immediate responses of bats to clear fell harvesting_revised.pdfFulltext - Published Version525.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.