Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/25085
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeary, Marianne Ten_UK
dc.contributor.authorReid, David Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMason, Michael Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFriscic, Tomislaven_UK
dc.contributor.authorDuer, Melinda Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCusack, Maggieen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-04T01:55:18Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-04T01:55:18Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2011-02-06en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/25085-
dc.description.abstractUnusually for invertebrates, linguliform brachiopods employ calcium phosphate mineral in hard tissue formation, in common with the evolutionarily distant vertebrates. Using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (SSNMR) and X-ray powder diffraction, we compare the organic constitution, crystallinity and organic matrix-mineral interface of phosphatic brachiopod shells with those of vertebrate bone. In particular, the organic-mineral interfaces crucial for the stability and properties of biomineral were probed with SSNMR rotational echo double resonance (REDOR). Lingula anatina and Discinisca tenuis shell materials yield strikingly dissimilar SSNMR spectra, arguing for quite different organic constitutions. However, their fluoroapatite-like mineral is highly crystalline, unlike the poorly ordered hydroxyapatite of bone. Neither shell material shows 13C{ 31P} REDOR effects, excluding strong physico-chemical interactions between mineral and organic matrix, unlike bone in which glycosaminoglycans and proteins are composited with mineral at sub-nanometre length scales. Differences between organic matrix of shell material from L. anatina and D. tenuis, and bone reflect evolutionary pressures from contrasting habitats and structural purposes. The absence of organic-mineral intermolecular associations in brachiopod shell argues that biomineralization follows different mechanistic pathways to bone; their details hold clues to the molecular structural evolution of phosphatic biominerals, and may provide insights into novel composite design. © 2010 The Royal Society.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherThe Royal Societyen_UK
dc.relationNeary MT, Reid DG, Mason MJ, Friscic T, Duer MJ & Cusack M (2011) Contrasts between organic participation in apatite biomineralization in brachiopod shell and vertebrate bone identified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 8 (55), pp. 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0238en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectLingula anatinaen_UK
dc.subjectDiscinisca tenuisen_UK
dc.subjectfrancoliteen_UK
dc.subjecthydroxyapatiteen_UK
dc.subjectfluoroapatiteen_UK
dc.subjectboneen_UK
dc.titleContrasts between organic participation in apatite biomineralization in brachiopod shell and vertebrate bone identified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-24en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[282.full.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsif.2010.0238en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid20610423en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of the Royal Society Interfaceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1742-5662en_UK
dc.citation.volume8en_UK
dc.citation.issue55en_UK
dc.citation.spage282en_UK
dc.citation.epage288en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmaggie.cusack@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date23/12/2010en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Cambridgeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000285574900011en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-78650802167en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid541428en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0145-1180en_UK
dc.date.accepted2010-06-16en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-06-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2017-02-24en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNeary, Marianne T|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReid, David G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMason, Michael J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFriscic, Tomislav|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDuer, Melinda J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCusack, Maggie|0000-0003-0145-1180en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename282.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1742-5662en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
282.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version408.58 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-24    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.