Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24653
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoubert, Liesbeten_UK
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Michael J Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Christine Ten_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-09T23:11:07Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-09T23:11:07Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-24en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24653-
dc.description.abstractNumerous research studies have shown that endorsing a catastrophic interpretation about pain is associated with deleterious outcomes, such as higher levels of distress, pain intensity and disability for the person in pain. The fear-avoidance model has been found to be useful in explaining these associations by stressing that heightened feelings of distress and behaviour aimed at reducing or avoiding pain might be adaptive in an acute pain context but can become maladaptive when the pain becomes chronic. Pain is rarely a private event and the communal coping model underscores that the heightened pain expression in people endorsing catastrophic thoughts about pain could have a social, communicative function of eliciting empathic responses in others. However, these models are not all-encompassing. In particular, neither of the models takes into account the growing evidence indicating that catastrophic thinking in observers can also impact their emotional experience and behaviour in response to the other’s pain. Moreover, the context of multiple goals in which pain and pain behaviour occurs is largely ignored in both models. In this article we present an integrative perspective on catastrophic thinking that takes into account the social system and interplay between different goals people in pain and observers might pursue (e.g., school/work performance, leisure, social engagement). Specifically, this integrative perspective stresses the importance of considering the bidirectional influence between catastrophic thoughts in the person experiencing pain and observers. Furthermore, the importance of balance between pain-relief and other important goals as well as in the level of catastrophic thoughts in understanding the maladaptive influence of catastrophic thinking will be underlined. Clinical implications and future research directions of this integrated perspective are discussed.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherIntermedcentral Incen_UK
dc.relationCaes L, Goubert L, Sullivan MJL & Chambers CT (2013) Catastrophic thinking about pain: A critical appraisal highlighting the importance of the social context and balance. Journal of Symptoms and Signs, 2 (5), pp. 298-308. http://www.intermedcentral.hk/index.php?journal=jss&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=107en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_UK
dc.subjectcatastrophizingen_UK
dc.subjectpainen_UK
dc.subjectdistressen_UK
dc.subjectprotective responsesen_UK
dc.subjectcommunicative functionen_UK
dc.subjectintegrated modelen_UK
dc.subjectbalanceen_UK
dc.subjectsocial systemen_UK
dc.titleCatastrophic thinking about pain: A critical appraisal highlighting the importance of the social context and balanceen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Symptoms and Signsen_UK
dc.citation.issn2309-6195en_UK
dc.citation.volume2en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage298en_UK
dc.citation.epage308en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.intermedcentral.hk/index.php?journal=jss&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=107en_UK
dc.author.emailline.caes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMcGill Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDalhousie Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid558160en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-07-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-07-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-07-13en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoubert, Liesbet|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSullivan, Michael J L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChambers, Christine T|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-12-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/|2016-12-09|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCaes_etal_JSS_2013.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2309-6195en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Caes_etal_JSS_2013.pdfFulltext - Published Version486.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.