|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Investigating the complexities of academic success: Personality constrains the effects of metacognition|
|Citation:||Kelly D & Donaldson D (2016) Investigating the complexities of academic success: Personality constrains the effects of metacognition. Psychology of Education Review, 40 (2), pp. 17-24. http://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/publication-by-series/psychology-of-education-review/the-psychology-of-education-review-vol-40-no-2-autumn-2016.html|
|Abstract:||Metacognition refers to thinking about thinking, reflecting self-awareness about one’s cognitive abilities. Metacognition has long been considered a core element of academic success because higher metacognitive ability allows individuals to be efficient learners. In reality, however, developments in our understanding of metacognition have not been adequate to support changes in educational practice. Theoretical models typically focus on two facets; knowledge and regulation. Critically, these models do not consider how individual differences, such as personality, impact on learning – despite a robust body of research indicating that personality also influences academic performance. The current paper asks whether there is a relationship between metacognition, personality and academic success. To address this issue we carried out a pilot study exploring the hypothesis that metacognition and personality interact to influence academic success. One hundred and twenty five university students completed the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) and the NEO-Five Factor Inventory. Participants also provided demographic information including age, gender, year and area of study. Findings support the importance of both metacognition and personality for learning outcomes, but importantly, suggest a significant interaction between metacognition and conscientiousness. Our data provide a novel insight into the role of metacognition in successful academic performance: personality constrains the value of metacognition – only when students are high in conscientiousness does metacognition predict academic grades.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Psychology of Education Review by British Psychological Association. The original publication is available at: http://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/publication-by-series/psychology-of-education-review/the-psychology-of-education-review-vol-40-no-2-autumn-2016.html|
|Feedback Competence Beliefs FINAL (1).pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||322.75 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.