Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24527
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReid, Jane Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorArcese, Peteren_UK
dc.contributor.authorKeller, Lukas Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGermain, Ryanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDuthie, A Bradleyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLosdat, Sylvainen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWolak, Matthewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNietlisbach, Pirminen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-09T23:25:59Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-09T23:25:59Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24527-
dc.description.abstractExtra-pair reproduction is widely hypothesized to allow females to avoid inbreeding with related socially paired males. Conse- quently, numerous field studies have tested the key predictions that extra-pair offspring are less inbred than females’ alternative within-pair offspring, and that the probability of extra-pair reproduction increases with a female’s relatedness to her socially paired male. However, such studies rarely measure inbreeding or relatedness sufficiently precisely to detect subtle effects, or consider biases stemming from failure to observe inbred offspring that die during early development. Analyses of multigenerational song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) pedigree data showed that most females had opportunity to increase or decrease the coefficient of inbreeding of their offspring through extra-pair reproduction with neighboring males. In practice, observed extra-pair offspring had lower inbreeding coefficients than females’ within-pair offspring on average, while the probability of extra-pair reproduc- tion increased substantially with the coefficient of kinship between a female and her socially paired male. However, simulations showed that such effects could simply reflect bias stemming from inbreeding depression in early offspring survival. The null hy- pothesis that extra-pair reproduction is random with respect to kinship therefore cannot be definitively rejected in song sparrows, and existing general evidence that females avoid inbreeding through extra-pair reproduction requires reevaluation given such biases.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationReid JM, Arcese P, Keller LF, Germain R, Duthie AB, Losdat S, Wolak M & Nietlisbach P (2015) Quantifying inbreeding avoidance through extra-pair reproduction. Evolution, 69 (1), pp. 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12557en_UK
dc.rights© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectInbreeding depressionen_UK
dc.subjectkinshipen_UK
dc.subjectmate choiceen_UK
dc.subjectpaternityen_UK
dc.subjectpolyandryen_UK
dc.subjectrelatednessen_UK
dc.titleQuantifying inbreeding avoidance through extra-pair reproductionen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/evo.12557en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid25346331en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEvolutionen_UK
dc.citation.issn1558-5646en_UK
dc.citation.issn0014-3820en_UK
dc.citation.volume69en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage59en_UK
dc.citation.epage74en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailalexander.duthie@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date24/10/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of British Columbiaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurichen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of British Columbiaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurichen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000347462800005en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84925452495en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid544637en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8343-4995en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-10-11en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-10-11en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-11-08en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorReid, Jane M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorArcese, Peter|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKeller, Lukas F|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGermain, Ryan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDuthie, A Bradley|0000-0001-8343-4995en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLosdat, Sylvain|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWolak, Matthew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNietlisbach, Pirmin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-11-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2016-11-09|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameReidEtAl2015.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0014-3820en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ReidEtAl2015.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.