|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Downside financial risk is misunderstood|
|Author(s):||Newall, Philip W S|
|Citation:||Newall PWS (2016) Downside financial risk is misunderstood, Judgement and Decision Making, 11 (5), pp. 416-423.|
|Abstract:||The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-even. Instead, many non-expert investors may assume for example that a 50% gain is sufficient to offset a 50% loss. Over 3,498 participants and five experiments, the widespread illusion that a sequence of equal percentage gains and losses produces a zero overall return was demonstrated. Participants continued to err frequently, even with percentage returns of +/-100%, or when financially incentivized. Financial literacy, numeracy, and deliberation were all shown to independently contribute to accurate performance. These results have implications for promoting the understanding of downside financial risk.|
|Rights:||Copyright: © 2016. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.