Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24153
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSelly, Sarah-Louise Counteren_UK
dc.contributor.authorHickey, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Jamie Ren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-05T23:53:42Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-05T23:53:42Z-
dc.date.issued2014-10-20en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24153-
dc.description.abstractStock enhancement of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salarL.), a fish of considerable economic and social importance, is commonplace. Supportive-breeding is a well-recognised method of enhancement which, when compared with traditional hatchery practices, is thought to reduce the severity of selection pressures on broodstock fish. Critically, in supportive-breeding programmes, the eggs and sperm used in the breeding process are taken from wild adult fish originating from the same catchment that resulting juvenile fish are subsequently stocked into, thereby avoiding problems associated with a lack of local adaptation in the stocked fish. Previous studies have indicated that sex bias during the hatchery process may result in reduced genetic diversity of the offspring. Utilising 16 microsatellite loci and two expressed sequence tag (EST) loci, we examined progeny from two hatcheries located on the rivers Exe and Tamar in southwest England, assessing the genetic diversity and parental contribution at each. Two strains were assessed within each hatchery. Genetic diversity was found to be reduced in offspring compared with that of the parent fish. This is likely the result of utilising a small number of broodstock in combination with parental bias. In the four hatchery strains studied (Bar, LEx, Lyd and TXL), parental contribution ranged between 2.1 and 29.2%, 12.2–51.0%, 2.0–70.0% and 4.0–40.0%, respectively. If this practice is to be continued, efforts should be made to improve adherence to national rearing guidelines by increasing the number of broodstock fish utilised and ensuring a more balanced contribution of all adults during the crossing process. Ultimately, we suggest a need to review the suitability of current national Atlantic salmon hatchery guidelines, particularly with regard to their use and relevance in small European rearing systems.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationSelly SC, Hickey J & Stevens JR (2014) A tale of two hatcheries: Assessing bias in the hatchery process for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture, 434, pp. 254-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.07.031en_UK
dc.rightsAccepted refereed manuscript of: Counter S, Hickey J & Stevens JR (2014) A tale of two hatcheries: Assessing bias in the hatchery process for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.), Aquaculture, 434, pp. 254-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.07.031 © 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectSalmo salaren_UK
dc.subjectSupportive-breedingen_UK
dc.subjectGenetic diversityen_UK
dc.subjectBroodstocken_UK
dc.subjectParental biasen_UK
dc.titleA tale of two hatcheries: Assessing bias in the hatchery process for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.07.031en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAquacultureen_UK
dc.citation.issn0044-8486en_UK
dc.citation.volume434en_UK
dc.citation.spage254en_UK
dc.citation.epage263en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailsarah-louise.counter@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date12/08/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWestcountry Rivers Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Exeteren_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000345058700036en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84906838123en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid551034en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5948-8800en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-07-31en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-07-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-08-31en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSelly, Sarah-Louise Counter|0000-0002-5948-8800en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHickey, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStevens, Jamie R|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-08-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2016-08-31|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameAQUA-D-14-00173R1.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0044-8486en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AQUA-D-14-00173R1.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.