Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24049
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLintott, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorBunnefeld, Nils-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kirsty-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-17T23:32:03Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24049-
dc.description.abstractThe rapid rate of urbanisation over the past century has occurred over a relatively small proportion of the earth's surface, yet it has had considerable ecological impact at a global scale. Urban waterways have historically been regarded as a disposable resource for human benefit which has had severe biological consequences. River rehabilitation schemes are attempting to address this; however restoration is frequently undertaken with minimal scientific input and fails to improve biodiversity. Many bat species are strongly associated with aquatic or adjacent riparian habitats but respond negatively to the built environment; however, we know little about the utilisation of urban waterways by bats. We therefore conducted a wide scale, multi-species study that examined how local habitat characteristics and the composition and heterogeneity of the surrounding landscape influence bat presence and activity along urban waterways. We recorded a total of 19,689 bat passes of seven species/genera from 30 urban waterways throughout the U.K. We show that the built environment can negatively affect a variety of species from the riparian zone up to 3km from a waterway. Additionally,Myotissp. activity was greater in waterways bounded by steep banksides and clear of invasive plant species. We also found differences in the response of two cryptic pipistrelle species to the built environment at multiple spatial scales indicating the difficulties of assessing how adaptable even morphologically similar species are to urbanisation. Beneficial urban waterway rehabilitation schemes for bats require management at multiple spatial scales. At a local scale, retaining a vegetated riparian zone, with a reduction in invasive aquatic plant species, is likely to benefit a variety of taxa. At a landscape scale, our results show that the influence of the built environment can stretch a considerable distance highlighting the necessity for conservation funding to be spent on the implementation of landscape scale environmental improvement schemes which encompass the entire urban matrix.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationLintott P, Bunnefeld N & Park K (2015) Opportunities for improving the foraging potential of urban waterways for bats, Biological Conservation, 191, pp. 224-233.-
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Lintott P, Bunnefeld N & Park K (2015) Opportunities for improving the foraging potential of urban waterways for bats, Biological Conservation, 191, pp. 224-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.036 © 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectChiropteraen_UK
dc.subjectCryptic speciesen_UK
dc.subjectFragmentationen_UK
dc.subjectInvasive speciesen_UK
dc.subjectLandscape managementen_UK
dc.subjectRiver habitaten_UK
dc.subjectUrban ecologyen_UK
dc.titleOpportunities for improving the foraging potential of urban waterways for batsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2018-01-06T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher requires embargo of 18 months after formal publication.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.036-
dc.citation.jtitleBiological Conservation-
dc.citation.issn0006-3207-
dc.citation.volume191-
dc.citation.spage224-
dc.citation.epage233-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPost-print (author final draft post-refereeing)-
dc.author.emailk.j.park@stir.ac.uk-
dc.citation.date07/07/2015-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirling-
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciences-
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciences-
dc.rights.embargoterms2018-01-07-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2018-01-07-
dc.identifier.isi000364257100025-
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Biological Conservation ms_revised.pdf543.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.