Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23888
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoubert, Liesbeten_UK
dc.contributor.authorDevos, Patriciaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVerlooy, Jorisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBenoit, Yvesen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVervoort, Tineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T00:32:38Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T00:32:38Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23888-
dc.description.abstractObjective. Caregivers’ pain estimations may have important implications for pediatric pain management decisions. Affective responses elicited by facing the child in pain are considered key in understanding caregivers’ estimations of pediatric pain experiences. Theory suggests differential influences of sympathy versus personal distress on pain estimations; yet empirical evidence on the impact of caregivers’ feelings of sympathy versus distress upon estimations of pediatric pain experiences is lacking. The current study explored the role of caregiver distress versus sympathy in understanding caregivers’ pain estimates of the child’s pain experience.  Design, Setting, Subjects and Methods. Using a prospective design in 31 children undergoing consecutive lumbar punctures and/or bone marrow aspirations at Ghent University Hospital, caregivers’ (i.e., parents, physicians, nurses, and child life specialists) distress and sympathy were assessed before each procedure; estimates of child pain were obtained immediately following each procedure.  Results. Results indicated that the child’s level of pain behavior in anticipation of the procedure had a strong influence on all caregivers’ pain estimations. Beyond the impact of child pain behavior, personal distress explained parental and physician’s estimates of child pain, but not pain estimates of nurses and child life specialists. Specifically, higher level of parental and physician’s distress was related to higher child pain estimates. Caregiver sympathy was not associated with pain estimations.  Conclusions. The current findings highlight the important role of caregivers’ felt personal distress when faced with child pain, rather than sympathy, in influencing their pain estimates. Potential implications for pain management are discussed.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_UK
dc.relationCaes L, Goubert L, Devos P, Verlooy J, Benoit Y & Vervoort T (2017) Personal distress and sympathy differentially influence health care professional and parents’ estimation of child procedure-related pain. Pain Medicine, 18 (2), pp. 275-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw083en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Pain Medicine following peer review. The version of record [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: http://painmedicine.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/04/28/pm.pnw083en_UK
dc.subjectDistressen_UK
dc.subjectSympathyen_UK
dc.subjectChilden_UK
dc.subjectParentsen_UK
dc.subjectHealth Care Professionalsen_UK
dc.subjectPain Estimatesen_UK
dc.titlePersonal distress and sympathy differentially influence health care professional and parents’ estimation of child procedure-related painen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2017-04-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Caes Goubert et al. 2016.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after first online publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnw083en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27125287en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePain Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn1526-4637en_UK
dc.citation.issn1526-2375en_UK
dc.citation.volume18en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage275en_UK
dc.citation.epage282en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailline.caes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date28/04/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000397103700009en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid558139en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-04-28en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-04-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-07-13en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoubert, Liesbet|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDevos, Patricia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVerlooy, Joris|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBenoit, Yves|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVervoort, Tine|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-04-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-04-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-04-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCaes Goubert et al. 2016.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1526-2375en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Caes Goubert et al. 2016.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version313.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.