Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status: ||Refereed|
|Title: ||Idealization, Justice, and the Form of Practical Reason|
|Author(s): ||Hope, Simon|
|Contact Email: ||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Issue Date: ||2016|
|Date Deposited: ||14-Jul-2016|
|Citation: ||Hope S (2016) Idealization, Justice, and the Form of Practical Reason. Social Philosophy and Policy, 33 (1-2), pp. 372-392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052516000224|
|Abstract: ||First paragraph: In this paper I argue for three claims. First, the question of which, if any, idealizations are justifiable in philosophical reflection on morality and justice cannot be separated from the question of what the appropriate form of reflection is. My second claim, invoking the ancient distinction between the forms of practical and theoretical reason, is that the appropriate form of reflection on standards of justice and morality is practical rather than theoretical. My third claim is that the form of practical reason cannot support many of the idealizations typically deployed in modern moral and political philosophy.|
|DOI Link: ||10.1017/S0265052516000224|
|Rights: ||This article has been published in a revised form in Social Philosophy and Policy https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052516000224. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for redistribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © 2016 Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation|
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.