Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHope, Simon-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: In this paper I argue for three claims. First, the question of which, if any, idealizations are justifiable in philosophical reflection on morality and justice cannot be separated from the question of what the appropriate form of reflection is. My second claim, invoking the ancient distinction between the forms of practical and theoretical reason, is that the appropriate form of reflection on standards of justice and morality is practical rather than theoretical. My third claim is that the form of practical reason cannot support many of the idealizations typically deployed in modern moral and political philosophy.en_UK
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relationHope S (2016) Idealization, Justice, and the Form of Practical Reason (Forthcoming), Social Philosophy and Policy.-
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. This article has been accepted for publication in Social Philosophy and Policy published by Cambridge University Press and will appear in a revised form subject to input from the Journal’s editor. The original publication will be available at:
dc.titleIdealization, Justice, and the Form of Practical Reason (Forthcoming)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleSocial Philosophy and Policy-
dc.type.statusPost-print (author final draft post-refereeing)-
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IDEALIZATIONHope.pdf342.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.