Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23835
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVervoort, Tineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTrost, Zinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSutterlin, Stefanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMoors, Agnesen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-16T22:54:49Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-16T22:54:49Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23835-
dc.description.abstractWe investigated the function of parental attention to child pain in regulating parental distress and pain control behaviour when observing their child performing a painful (cold pressor) task (CPT); we also studied the moderating role of parental state anxiety. Participants were 62 schoolchildren and one of their parents. Parental attention towards or away from child pain (ie, attend to pain vs avoid pain) was experimentally manipulated during a viewing task pairing unfamiliar children's neutral and pain faces. Before and after the viewing task, parental distress regulation was assessed by heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV). In a subsequent phase, parents observed their own child perform a CPT task, allowing assessment of parental pain control behaviour (indexed by latency to stop their child's CPT performance) and parental distress, which was assessed via self-report before and after observation of child CPT performance. Eye tracking during the viewing task and self-reported attention to own child's pain confirmed successful attention manipulation. Further, findings indicated that the effect of attentional strategy on parental emotion regulation (indexed by HR, self-report) and pain control behaviour depended on parents' state anxiety. Specifically, whereas low anxious parents reported more distress and demonstrated more pain control behaviour in the Attend to Pain condition, high anxious parents reported more distress and showed more pain control behaviour in the Avoid Pain condition. This inverse pattern was likewise apparent in physiological distress indices (HR) in response to the initial viewing task. Theoretical/clinical implications and further research directions are discussed.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationVervoort T, Trost Z, Sutterlin S, Caes L & Moors A (2014) Emotion regulatory function of parent attention to child pain and associated implications for parental pain control behaviour. Pain, 155 (8), pp. 1453-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.015en_UK
dc.rightsAccepted refereed manuscript of: Vervoort T, Trost Z, Sutterlin S, Caes L & Moors A (2014) Emotion regulatory function of parent attention to child pain and associated implications for parental pain control behaviour, Pain, 155 (8), pp. 1453-1463. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.015 © 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectAttentionen_UK
dc.subjectChildrenen_UK
dc.subjectEmotion regulationen_UK
dc.subjectEye movementen_UK
dc.subjectFacial pain expressionen_UK
dc.subjectParental protective behaviouren_UK
dc.subjectParentsen_UK
dc.titleEmotion regulatory function of parent attention to child pain and associated implications for parental pain control behaviouren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.015en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid24769189en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePAINen_UK
dc.citation.issn1872-6623en_UK
dc.citation.issn0304-3959en_UK
dc.citation.volume155en_UK
dc.citation.issue8en_UK
dc.citation.spage1453en_UK
dc.citation.epage1463en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailline.caes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date21/04/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of North Texasen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLillehammer University Collegeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGhent Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000340309800009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84904684419en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid559228en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-04-14en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-04-14en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-07-13en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorVervoort, Tine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTrost, Zina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSutterlin, Stefan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoors, Agnes|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-07-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2016-07-15|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameVervoort Trost et al. 2014.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0304-3959en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Vervoort Trost et al. 2014.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version590.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.