Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23760
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilson, J T Lindsayen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarsden-Loftus, Isaacen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKoskinen, Sannaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBakx, Wilberten_UK
dc.contributor.authorBullinger, Monikaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFormisano, Ritaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMaas, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNeugebauer, Edmunden_UK
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Janeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSarajuuri, Jaanaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSasse, Nadineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVon Steinbuchel, Nicoleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVon Wild, Klausen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTruelle, Jean-Lucen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-12T23:27:10Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-12T23:27:10Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23760-
dc.description.abstractThe Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) instruments are traumatic brain injury-specific assessments of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with established validity and reliability. The purpose of the study is to help improve the interpretability of the two QOLIBRI summary scores (the QOLIBRI Total score and the QOLBRI Overall Scale score). An analysis was conducted of 761 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) that took part in the QOLIBRI validation studies. A cross-walk between QOLIBRI scores and the SF-36 Mental Component Summary norm-based scoring system was performed using geometric mean regression analysis. The exercise supports a previous suggestion that QOLIBRI Total scores < 60 indicate low or impaired HRQoL, and indicate that the corresponding score on the QOLIBRI-OS is <52. The percentage of cases in the sample that fell into the ‘impaired HRQoL’ category were 36% for the Mental Component Summary, 38% for the QOLIBRI Total, and 39% for the QOLIBRI-OS. Relationships between the QOLIBRI scales and the Glasgow Outcome Scale – Extended (GOSE), as a measure of global function, are presented in the form of means and standard deviations that allow comparison with other studies, and data on age and gender are presented for the QOLIBRI-OS. While bearing in mind the potential imprecision of the comparison, the findings provide a framework for evaluating QOLIBRI summary scores in relation to generic HRQoL that improves their interpretability.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_UK
dc.relationWilson JTL, Marsden-Loftus I, Koskinen S, Bakx W, Bullinger M, Formisano R, Maas A, Neugebauer E, Powell J, Sarajuuri J, Sasse N, Von Steinbuchel N, Von Wild K & Truelle J (2017) Interpreting Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) scores: Cross-walk with the Short Form-36. Journal of Neurotrauma, 34 (1), pp. 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4287en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Final publication is available from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4287en_UK
dc.subjectTBIen_UK
dc.subjectoutcome measuresen_UK
dc.subjecthealth-related quality of lifeen_UK
dc.subjectQOLIBRIen_UK
dc.subjectSF-36en_UK
dc.subjectGOSEen_UK
dc.titleInterpreting Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) scores: Cross-walk with the Short Form-36en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2017-06-14en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Wilson et al 2016 Interpreting QOLIBRI scores Final.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after online publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/neu.2015.4287en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27297289en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Neurotraumaen_UK
dc.citation.issn1557-9042en_UK
dc.citation.issn0897-7151en_UK
dc.citation.volume34en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage59en_UK
dc.citation.epage65en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissionen_UK
dc.author.emailjtlw1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date13/06/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Helsinkien_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHoensbroeck and Maastricht Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germanyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSanta Lucia Foundation, Italyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity Hospital Antwerp, Belgiumen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPrivate University of Witten/Herdecke, Germanyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGoldsmiths College, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationValidia Rehabilitation Helsinkien_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGeorg-August University Gottingenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGeorg-August University Gottingenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWestphalian Wilhelms-University of Munsteren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationC.H.U. Raymond-Poincare, Franceen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000390420100008en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85008204239en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid571778en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4113-2328en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-05-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-05-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-05-06en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectCollaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBIen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefGrant Agreement No 602150-2en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilson, J T Lindsay|0000-0003-4113-2328en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarsden-Loftus, Isaac|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKoskinen, Sanna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBakx, Wilbert|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBullinger, Monika|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFormisano, Rita|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMaas, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNeugebauer, Edmund|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPowell, Jane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSarajuuri, Jaana|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSasse, Nadine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVon Steinbuchel, Nicole|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVon Wild, Klaus|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTruelle, Jean-Luc|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectGrant Agreement No 602150-2|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-06-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-06-13en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2017-06-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameWilson et al 2016 Interpreting QOLIBRI scores Final.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0897-7151en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wilson et al 2016 Interpreting QOLIBRI scores Final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version496.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.