Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23580
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Impact of Management on Avian Communities in the Scottish Highlands
Author(s): Newey, Scott
Mustin, Karen
Bryce, Rosalind
Fielding, Debbie
Redpath, Steve
Bunnefeld, Nils
Daniel, Bronwen
Irvine, R Justin
Contact Email: nils.bunnefeld@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: 19-May-2016
Date Deposited: 5-Jul-2016
Citation: Newey S, Mustin K, Bryce R, Fielding D, Redpath S, Bunnefeld N, Daniel B & Irvine RJ (2016) Impact of Management on Avian Communities in the Scottish Highlands. PLoS ONE, 11 (5), Art. No.: e0155473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155473
Abstract: The protection of biodiversity is a key national and international policy objective. While protected areas provide one approach, a major challenge lies in understanding how the conservation of biodiversity can be achieved in the context of multiple land management objectives in the wider countryside. Here we analyse metrics of bird diversity in the Scottish uplands in relation to land management types and explore how bird species composition varies in relation to land managed for grazing, hunting and conservation. Birds were surveyed on the heather moorland areas of 26 different landholdings in Scotland. The results indicate that, in relation to dominant management type, the composition of bird species varies but measures of diversity and species richness do not. Intensive management for grouse shooting affects the occurrence, absolute and relative abundance of bird species. While less intensive forms of land management appear to only affect the relative abundance of species, though extensive sheep grazing appears to have little effect on avian community composition. Therefore enhanced biodiversity at the landscape level is likely to be achieved by maintaining heterogeneity in land management among land management units. This result should be taken into account when developing policies that consider how to achieve enhanced biodiversity outside protected areas, in the context of other legitimate land-uses.
DOI Link: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155473
Rights: © 2016 Newey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0155473.PDFFulltext - Published Version899.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.