Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2345
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, Mark Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Steve Een_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-09T11:47:32Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-09T11:47:32Z-
dc.date.issued2010-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2345-
dc.description.abstractEvent-related fMRI studies reveal that episodic memory retrieval modulates lateral and medial parietal cortices, dorsal middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior pFC. These regions respond more for recognized old than correctly rejected new words, suggesting a neural correlate of retrieval success. Despite significant efforts examining retrieval success regions, their role in retrieval remains largely unknown. Here we asked the question, to what degree are the regions performing memory-specific operations? And if so, are they all equally sensitive to successful retrieval, or are other factors such as error detection also implicated? We investigated this question by testing whether activity in retrieval success regions was associated with task-specific contingencies (i.e., perceived targetness) or mnemonic relevance (e.g., retrieval of source context). To do this, we used a source memory task that required discrimination between remembered targets and remembered nontargets. For a given region, the modulation of neural activity by a situational factor such as target status would suggest a more domain-general role; similarly, modulations of activity linked to error detection would suggest a role inmonitoring and control rather than the accumulation of evidence from memory per se. We found that parietal retrieval success regions exhibited greater activity for items receiving correct than incorrect source responses, whereas frontal retrieval success regions were most active on error trials, suggesting that posterior regions signal successful retrieval whereas frontal regions monitor retrieval outcome. In addition, perceived targetness failed to modulate fMRI activity in any retrieval success region, suggesting that these regions are retrieval specific. We discuss the different functions that these regions may support and propose an accumulator model that captures the different pattern of responses seen in frontal and parietal retrieval success regions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press)en_UK
dc.relationDonaldson D, Wheeler ME & Petersen SE (2010) Remember the source: Dissociating frontal and parietal contributions to episodic memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (2), pp. 377-391. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/jocn; https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21242en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/jocn. © Copyright Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press 2010.en_UK
dc.subjectMemoryen_UK
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_UK
dc.titleRemember the source: Dissociating frontal and parietal contributions to episodic memoryen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/jocn.2009.21242en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Cognitive Neuroscienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1530-8898en_UK
dc.citation.issn0898-929Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume22en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage377en_UK
dc.citation.epage391en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/jocnen_UK
dc.author.emaild.i.donaldson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/01/2010en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Pittsburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWashington University In Saint Louisen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000274034500013en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-75749158546en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid811509en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8036-3455en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-01-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2010-06-16en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDonaldson, David|0000-0002-8036-3455en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWheeler, Mark E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPetersen, Steve E|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2010-06-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2010-06-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameDonaldson-JCN.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0898-929Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Donaldson-JCN.pdfFulltext - Published Version507.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.