Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2339
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDixon, Diane-
dc.contributor.advisorO'Carroll, Ronan E.-
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, Nicola-
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-09T15:08:10Z-
dc.date.available2010-06-09T15:08:10Z-
dc.date.issued2010-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2339-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The prevalence of disability increases with age; therefore with an aging population, interventions to reduce disability are crucial. This thesis adopts a behavioural conceptualisation of disability. The theoretical frameworks of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the integrated ICF/TPB model are applied to investigate disability and physical activity (PA) behaviours. The thesis aims to: (1) identify the factors involved in the prioritisation of patients for total joint replacement; (2) classify patient pre-operative expectations of total hip replacement (THR) and investigate the relationship between expectations and recovery after surgery, and; (3) test whether the TPB and theory-based interventions can predict and explain PA within individuals. Method: Five studies were conducted. In the first study, health professionals judged whether the items from two prioritisation tools measured each of the ICF constructs. In the second study, surgeons ranked patient vignettes, which differed by constructs from the integrated model, in order of priority for THR. In the third study, a large cohort of THR patients reported expectations of surgery pre-operatively. Health and functioning were also reported pre-operatively and 1-year post-operatively. The fourth and fifth studies were a series of experimental n-of-1 studies using diary methods assessing TPB cognitions and PA behaviours. Results: There is a lack of agreement between judges in relation to the content of many of the items from prioritisation tools. Behavioural and psychological factors can influence prioritisation for THR. The majority of patient expectations of THR addressed activities and social participation; however, the evidence for a relationship between expectations and recovery was limited. The TPB can predict PA within some individuals but the evidence in support of interventions to increase PA was limited. Discussion: The findings provide important clinical and theoretical implications for understanding disability and physical activity behaviours.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen
dc.subjectphysical activityen
dc.subjectdisabilityen
dc.subjecttheory of planned behaviouren
dc.subjectinternational classification of functioning, disability and healthen
dc.subjectbehaviour change interventionen
dc.subject.lcshDisabled Personsen
dc.subject.lcshPhysical education for people with disabilitiesen
dc.titleDisability and physical activity behaviours: an application of theoretical frameworksen
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.relation.referencesHadorn,DC & Holmes,AC (1997). The New Zealand priority crietria project: part 1 overview. British Medical Journal, 314; 131-134en
dc.relation.referencesArnett, G., Hadorn, D. C., & Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project (2003). Developing priority criteria for hip and knee replacement: results from the Western Canada Waiting List Project. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 290-296.en
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.embargodate2011-02-
dc.rights.embargoreasonArticles in preparationen
dc.author.emailnicki_hobbs53@hotmail.comen
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Natural Sciences-
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychology-
Appears in Collections:Psychology eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NHobbsFinalThesis.pdf4.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.