Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23361
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Julieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Carroll, Ronanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrownlee, Lindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLibby, Gillianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Roberten_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-07T22:19:05Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-07T22:19:05Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-05en_UK
dc.identifier.other13en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23361-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Screening is key to early detection but uptake of national programmes is poor, especially amongst those from lower socio-economic backgrounds. Decisions not to take up screening may be based more on emotional rather than rational evaluations. We aimed to examine the importance of perceived disgust (the ‘ICK’ factor) in determining colorectal cancer screening uptake, in a large, randomised controlled trial. Methods: This paper reports secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based Anticipated Regret (AR) intervention, which was delivered alongside existing pre-notification letters. 60,000 adults aged 50- 74 who were participant in the Scottish National Screening programme were randomised to one of 3 treatment arms: 1) no questionnaire (control), 2) Health Locus of Control (HLOC) questionnaire or 3) AR questionnaire. Primary outcome was Faecal Occult Blood Test kit return (FOBT uptake). 13,645 people completed questionnaires of secondary outcomes including intention to return test kit and a new self-report measure of perceived disgust (ICK-C). Results: Intentions, ICK and AR were all predictors of FOBT uptake; however, for people who expressed strong intentions to return their FOBT kit, only ICK differentiated kit returners from non-returners, with non-returners reporting higher disgust (mean difference=0.51; 95% CI for difference (0.37, 0.64), Cohen’s d=0.34). The 4-item ICK-C showed excellent internal reliability and predictive validity with regard to an objective measure i.e., FOBT uptake. Conclusions: The findings show that perceived disgust is an important emotional psychological construct in determining uptake of colorectal cancer screening. We also demonstrated that a simple 4-item scale (the ‘ICK-C), developed to be used in research on colorectal cancer screening, has excellent psychometric properties.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisheriMedPuben_UK
dc.relationChambers J, O'Carroll R, Brownlee L, Libby G & Steele R (2016) Colorectal cancer screening and perceived disgust: the importance of the “ICK” factor in Faecal Occult Blood Test uptake. Colorectal Cancer: Open Access, 2 (1), Art. No.: 13. http://colorectal-cancer.imedpub.com/archive.phpen_UK
dc.rightsPublished under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectColorectal canceren_UK
dc.subjectScreeningen_UK
dc.subjectFaecal occult blood testen_UK
dc.subjectDisgust the ‘ICK’ factoren_UK
dc.titleColorectal cancer screening and perceived disgust: the importance of the “ICK” factor in Faecal Occult Blood Test uptakeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleColorectal Cancer: Open Accessen_UK
dc.citation.issnNo ISSNen_UK
dc.citation.volume2en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://colorectal-cancer.imedpub.com/archive.phpen_UK
dc.author.emailronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date05/02/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationScottish Bowel Screening Centreen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid578740en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-02-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-06-22en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot chargeden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorChambers, Julie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Carroll, Ronan|0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrownlee, Linda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLibby, Gillian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSteele, Robert|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-06-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2016-06-22|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameColorect Cancer 2016 Chambers.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.sourceNo ISSNen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Colorect Cancer 2016 Chambers.pdfFulltext - Published Version321.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.