Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23281
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mileva, Viktoria R | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, Alex L | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Russell, Richard | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Little, Anthony | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-17T22:22:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-17T22:22:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-10 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23281 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Women wearing cosmetics have been associated with a higher earning potential and higher status jobs. However, recent literature suggests that status can be accrued through two distinct routes: dominance and prestige (Henrich & Gil-White, 2001). In two experiments, we applied a standardized amount of cosmetics to female faces using computer software. We then asked participants to rate faces with and without cosmetics for various traits including attractiveness, dominance, and prestige. Men and women both rated the faces with cosmetics added as higher in attractiveness. However, only women rated faces with cosmetics as higher in dominance, while only men rated them as higher in prestige. In a follow up study, we investigated whether these enhanced perceptions of dominance from women were caused by jealousy. We found that women experience more jealousy toward women with cosmetics, and view these women as more attractive to men and more promiscuous. Our findings suggest that cosmetics may function as an extended phenotype and can alter other’s perceptions differently depending on the perceiver’s sex. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | SAGE | en_UK |
dc.relation | Mileva VR, Jones AL, Russell R & Little A (2016) Sex Differences in the Perceived Dominance and Prestige of Women With and Without Cosmetics. Perception, 45 (10), pp. 1166-1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053 | en_UK |
dc.rights | Published in Perception by Sage Publications. Published version of the article on SAGE Journals at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053 | en_UK |
dc.subject | cosmetics | en_UK |
dc.subject | sex differences | en_UK |
dc.subject | attractiveness | en_UK |
dc.subject | social status | en_UK |
dc.subject | jealousy | en_UK |
dc.title | Sex Differences in the Perceived Dominance and Prestige of Women With and Without Cosmetics | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0301006616652053 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27288188 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Perception | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1468-4233 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0301-0066 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 45 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 10 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 1166 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 1183 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.author.email | v.r.mileva@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 09/06/2016 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Swansea University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Gettysburg College | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000384447400006 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84988420358 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 568675 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-7983-3069 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-05-02 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2016-05-02 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2016-06-03 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Mileva, Viktoria R|0000-0002-7983-3069 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Jones, Alex L| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Russell, Richard| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Little, Anthony| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2016-06-09 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2016-06-09 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2016-06-09| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | 7702_MB_Manuscript_FINAL_03_06_16.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 0301-0066 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
7702_MB_Manuscript_FINAL_03_06_16.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 377.92 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.