Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23281
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMileva, Viktoria Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorJones, Alex Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Richarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Anthonyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-17T22:22:28Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-17T22:22:28Z-
dc.date.issued2016-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23281-
dc.description.abstractWomen wearing cosmetics have been associated with a higher earning potential and higher status jobs. However, recent literature suggests that status can be accrued through two distinct routes: dominance and prestige (Henrich & Gil-White, 2001). In two experiments, we applied a standardized amount of cosmetics to female faces using computer software. We then asked participants to rate faces with and without cosmetics for various traits including attractiveness, dominance, and prestige. Men and women both rated the faces with cosmetics added as higher in attractiveness. However, only women rated faces with cosmetics as higher in dominance, while only men rated them as higher in prestige. In a follow up study, we investigated whether these enhanced perceptions of dominance from women were caused by jealousy. We found that women experience more jealousy toward women with cosmetics, and view these women as more attractive to men and more promiscuous. Our findings suggest that cosmetics may function as an extended phenotype and can alter other’s perceptions differently depending on the perceiver’s sex.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGEen_UK
dc.relationMileva VR, Jones AL, Russell R & Little A (2016) Sex Differences in the Perceived Dominance and Prestige of Women With and Without Cosmetics. Perception, 45 (10), pp. 1166-1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Perception by Sage Publications. Published version of the article on SAGE Journals at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053en_UK
dc.subjectcosmeticsen_UK
dc.subjectsex differencesen_UK
dc.subjectattractivenessen_UK
dc.subjectsocial statusen_UK
dc.subjectjealousyen_UK
dc.titleSex Differences in the Perceived Dominance and Prestige of Women With and Without Cosmeticsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0301006616652053en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27288188en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePerceptionen_UK
dc.citation.issn1468-4233en_UK
dc.citation.issn0301-0066en_UK
dc.citation.volume45en_UK
dc.citation.issue10en_UK
dc.citation.spage1166en_UK
dc.citation.epage1183en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailv.r.mileva@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date09/06/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwansea Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGettysburg Collegeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000384447400006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84988420358en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid568675en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7983-3069en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-05-02en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-05-02en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-06-03en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMileva, Viktoria R|0000-0002-7983-3069en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Alex L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRussell, Richard|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLittle, Anthony|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-06-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2016-06-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2016-06-09|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename7702_MB_Manuscript_FINAL_03_06_16.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0301-0066en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7702_MB_Manuscript_FINAL_03_06_16.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version377.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.