Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23163
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Anthonyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBurriss, Roberten_UK
dc.contributor.authorCobey, Kelly Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorKlapilova, Katerinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHavlicek, Janen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJones, Benedict Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDeBruine, Lisa Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorPetrie, Marionen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-06T04:54:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-06T04:54:35Z-
dc.date.issued2014-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23163-
dc.description.abstractHormonal fluctuation across the menstrual cycle explains temporal variation in women’s judgment of the attractiveness of members of the opposite sex. Use of hormonal contraceptives could therefore influence both initial partner choice and, if contraceptive use subsequently changes, intrapair dynamics. Associations between hormonal contraceptive use and relationship satisfaction may thus be best understood by considering whether current use is congruent with use when relationships formed, rather than by considering current use alone. In the study reported here, we tested this congruency hypothesis in a survey of 365 couples. Controlling for potential confounds (including relationship duration, age, parenthood, and income), we found that congruency in current and previous hormonal contraceptive use, but not current use alone, predicted women’s sexual satisfaction with their partners. Congruency was not associated with women’s nonsexual satisfaction or with the satisfaction of their male partners. Our results provide empirical support for the congruency hypothesis and suggest that women’s sexual satisfaction is influenced by changes in partner preference associated with change in hormonal contraceptive use.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGEen_UK
dc.relationRoberts SC, Little A, Burriss R, Cobey KD, Klapilova K, Havlicek J, Jones BC, DeBruine LM & Petrie M (2014) Partner choice, relationship satisfaction, and oral contraception: the congruency hypothesis. Psychological Science, 25 (7), pp. 1497-1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614532295en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Psychological Science July 2014 vol. 25 no. 7 1497-1503 by SAGE. The original publication is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614532295en_UK
dc.subjectmenstrual cycleen_UK
dc.subjectmate choiceen_UK
dc.subjectromantic relationshipsen_UK
dc.subjectsexual desireen_UK
dc.subjecthormonal contraceptionen_UK
dc.subjectmajor histocompatibility complexen_UK
dc.subjectMHCen_UK
dc.subjectmasculinityen_UK
dc.titlePartner choice, relationship satisfaction, and oral contraception: the congruency hypothesisen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0956797614532295en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid24818612en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePsychological Scienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1467-9280en_UK
dc.citation.issn0956-7976en_UK
dc.citation.volume25en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.spage1497en_UK
dc.citation.epage1503en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderThe British Academyen_UK
dc.contributor.funderEconomic and Social Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date12/05/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000340131300023en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84904305245en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid574485en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2797-1686en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-03-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-03-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-04-19en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectConsequences of Using Hormonal contraception during Partner Choiceen_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectIs there ill in the pill? Exploring social consequences of partner choice while using hormonal contraceptionen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefES/I008217/1en_UK
dc.relation.funderrefMD130037en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLittle, Anthony|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBurriss, Robert|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCobey, Kelly D|0000-0003-2797-1686en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKlapilova, Katerina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHavlicek, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Benedict C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDeBruine, Lisa M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPetrie, Marion|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectES/I008217/1|Economic and Social Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269en_UK
local.rioxx.projectMD130037|The British Academy|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-04-19en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2016-04-19|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameRoberts et al_Revised ms_final.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0956-7976en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Roberts et al_Revised ms_final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version245.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.