Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23162
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Allen, Caroline | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Cobey, Kelly D | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Havlicek, Jan | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Roberts, S Craig | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-23T22:35:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-23T22:35:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-11 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23162 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We investigated the impact of artificial fragrances on the accurate detection of biologically relevant information in human body odor. To do this, we examined cross-sensory consistency (across faces and odors) in the perception of masculinity and femininity in men and women, and how consistency is influenced by the use of artificial fragrance. Independent sets of same and opposite-sex participants rated odor samples (with and without a fragrance, N = 239 raters), and photographs (N = 130) of 20 men and 20 women. In female, but not male raters, judgments of masculinity/femininity of non-fragranced odor and faces were correlated. However, the correlation between female ratings of male facial and odor masculinity was not evident when assessing a body odor and fragrance blend. Further analysis also indicated that differences in ratings of male odor masculinity between men with very masculine or high and low levels of facial masculinity were removed by the addition of fragrance. This effect was absent in ratings of female odors by both female and male raters, suggesting sex-specificity in the effects of fragrance on odor perception. The widespread use of artificial fragrance in many modern populations raises questions about how this cultural practice influences ability to detect and utilize mate-choice relevant cues. Our findings suggest that women may be more sensitive to these cues, and therefore also to disruption of this information through fragrance use. We discuss our results using the framework of culture-gene coevolution. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_UK |
dc.relation | Allen C, Cobey KD, Havlicek J & Roberts SC (2016) The impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odor. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (6), pp. 481-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.001 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Allen C, Cobey KD, Havlicek J & Roberts SC (2016) The impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odor, Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (6), pp. 481-489. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.001 © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | fragrance | en_UK |
dc.subject | olfactory communication | en_UK |
dc.subject | body odor | en_UK |
dc.subject | mate choice | en_UK |
dc.subject | cosmetics | en_UK |
dc.subject | perfume | en_UK |
dc.title | The impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odor | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2017-05-12 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [Masc-Fem_MS (2).pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.001 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Evolution and Human Behavior | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1090-5138 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 37 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 6 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 481 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 489 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.author.email | craig.roberts@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 11/05/2016 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Charles University in Prague | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000386194600007 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84976474295 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 574255 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-2797-1686 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-9641-6101 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-05-04 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2016-05-04 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2016-04-18 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Allen, Caroline| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Cobey, Kelly D|0000-0003-2797-1686 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Havlicek, Jan| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Roberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2017-05-12 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-05-11 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2017-05-12| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Masc-Fem_MS (2).pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1090-5138 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Masc-Fem_MS (2).pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 335.5 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.