Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23162
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Carolineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCobey, Kelly Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorHavlicek, Janen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-23T22:35:05Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-23T22:35:05Z-
dc.date.issued2016-11en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23162-
dc.description.abstractWe investigated the impact of artificial fragrances on the accurate detection of biologically relevant information in human body odor. To do this, we examined cross-sensory consistency (across faces and odors) in the perception of masculinity and femininity in men and women, and how consistency is influenced by the use of artificial fragrance. Independent sets of same and opposite-sex participants rated odor samples (with and without a fragrance, N = 239 raters), and photographs (N = 130) of 20 men and 20 women. In female, but not male raters, judgments of masculinity/femininity of non-fragranced odor and faces were correlated. However, the correlation between female ratings of male facial and odor masculinity was not evident when assessing a body odor and fragrance blend. Further analysis also indicated that differences in ratings of male odor masculinity between men with very masculine or high and low levels of facial masculinity were removed by the addition of fragrance. This effect was absent in ratings of female odors by both female and male raters, suggesting sex-specificity in the effects of fragrance on odor perception. The widespread use of artificial fragrance in many modern populations raises questions about how this cultural practice influences ability to detect and utilize mate-choice relevant cues. Our findings suggest that women may be more sensitive to these cues, and therefore also to disruption of this information through fragrance use. We discuss our results using the framework of culture-gene coevolution.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationAllen C, Cobey KD, Havlicek J & Roberts SC (2016) The impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odor. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (6), pp. 481-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.001en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Allen C, Cobey KD, Havlicek J & Roberts SC (2016) The impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odor, Evolution and Human Behavior, 37 (6), pp. 481-489. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.001 © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectfragranceen_UK
dc.subjectolfactory communicationen_UK
dc.subjectbody odoren_UK
dc.subjectmate choiceen_UK
dc.subjectcosmeticsen_UK
dc.subjectperfumeen_UK
dc.titleThe impact of artificial fragrances on the assessment of mate quality cues in body odoren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2017-05-12en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Masc-Fem_MS (2).pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.05.001en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEvolution and Human Behavioren_UK
dc.citation.issn1090-5138en_UK
dc.citation.volume37en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spage481en_UK
dc.citation.epage489en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date11/05/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000386194600007en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84976474295en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid574255en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2797-1686en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-05-04en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-05-04en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-04-18en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAllen, Caroline|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCobey, Kelly D|0000-0003-2797-1686en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHavlicek, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2017-05-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2017-05-11en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2017-05-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMasc-Fem_MS (2).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1090-5138en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Masc-Fem_MS (2).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version335.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.