Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23158
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHavlicek, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorCobey, Kelly D-
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorKlapilova, Katerina-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craig-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-06T01:52:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23158-
dc.description.abstractWe welcome the wide range of comments provoked by the introduction of our alternative theoretical perspective on the peri-ovulation paradigm (Havlíček etal. 2015)—some positive and some very critical—and here we address briefly some of the key objectionsen_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relationHavlicek J, Cobey KD, Barrett L, Klapilova K & Roberts SC (2015) Greater precision, not parsimony, is the key to testing the peri-ovulation spandrel hypothesis: a response to comments on Havlíček et al. 2015. Behavioral Ecology, 26 (5), pp. 1265-1267.-
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Behavioral Ecology (2015) 26 (5): 1265-1267 by Oxford University Press. The original publication is available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv137-
dc.titleGreater precision, not parsimony, is the key to testing the peri-ovulation spandrel hypothesis: a response to comments on Havlíček et al. 2015en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2016-10-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv137-
dc.citation.jtitleBehavioral Ecology-
dc.citation.issn1045-2249-
dc.citation.volume26-
dc.citation.issue5-
dc.citation.spage1265-
dc.citation.epage1267-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uk-
dc.citation.date20/08/2015-
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Prague-
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychology-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Lethbridge-
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Prague-
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychology-
dc.rights.embargoterms2016-11-01-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2016-11-01-
dc.identifier.isi000361373500009-
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Havlicek_etal_reply_final.pdf277.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.