Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23150
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNovakova, Lenka Martinecen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHavlicek, Janen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-06T01:03:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-06T01:03:02Z-
dc.date.issued2014-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23150-
dc.description.abstractCycle-correlated variation in olfactory threshold, with women becoming more sensitive to odors mid-cycle, is somewhat supported by the literature but the evidence is not entirely consistent, with several studies finding no, or mixed, effects. It has been argued that cyclic shifts in olfactory threshold might be limited to odors relevant to the mating context. We aimed to test whether the evidence currently available points in the direction of odor-specific or, rather, general changes in olfactory sensitivity and, if the former is the case, to what group of odorants in particular. We carried out a meta-analysis of relevant studies which together used a variety of different odorants, including some found in food, body odor, and some that occur in neither of these. First we tested whether there appears to be an overall effect when all studies are included. Next, we hypothesised that if cyclic changes in olfactory processing are odor-specific and tuned to biologically relevant odors, we should find changes in detection thresholds only for odorants found in body odor, or for those that are perceptually similar to it. In contrast, if threshold patterns are linked to more general fluctuations in odor processing across the cycle, we would not expect changes in relation to any particular odorant group. The results support the view that there is significant cycle-correlated variation. Thresholds were in general significantly lower in the fertile than the non-fertile phases, with effect sizes consistently in this direction. This same conclusion applied to both ‘food’ and ‘musky’ odorants, despite their different evolutionary significance, and to the androgen steroids (androstadienone, androstenone, and androsterone), but could not be applied to phenyl-ethyl alcohol. The results indicate that olfactory sensitivity may be a non-adaptive by-product of the general physiological fluctuations or differences in neural processing experienced across the cycle to a broad spectrum of odorants, rather than being specifically selected for mate choice-related odors.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherDeGruyteren_UK
dc.relationNovakova LM, Havlicek J & Roberts SC (2014) Olfactory processing and odor specificity: a meta-analysis of menstrual cycle variation in olfactory sensitivity. Anthropological Review, 77 (3), pp. 331-345. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2014-0024en_UK
dc.rights© Anthropological Review. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectmenstrual cycleen_UK
dc.subjectmate choiceen_UK
dc.subjectodor thresholden_UK
dc.subjecthuman oestrusen_UK
dc.subjectolfactionen_UK
dc.titleOlfactory processing and odor specificity: a meta-analysis of menstrual cycle variation in olfactory sensitivityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/anre-2014-0024en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAnthropological Reviewen_UK
dc.citation.issn2083-4594en_UK
dc.citation.volume77en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage331en_UK
dc.citation.epage345en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderThe British Academyen_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date20/12/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84920274876en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid574470en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-11-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-11-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-04-19en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectIs there ill in the pill? Exploring social consequences of partner choice while using hormonal contraceptionen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefMD130037en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNovakova, Lenka Martinec|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHavlicek, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.projectMD130037|The British Academy|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-04-19en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2016-04-19|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameNovakova et al_Anthro Rev_2014.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Novakova et al_Anthro Rev_2014.pdfFulltext - Published Version324.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.