Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23145
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The Sale of Edited Electoral Registers in Scotland: Implications for Privacy, Data Protection and Citizenship
Author(s): Leleux, Charles
Webster, C William R
Contact Email: charles.leleux@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Electoral Registration Officers (EROs)
National Survey of Scotland’s Electoral Registration Officers
electoral registers
citizenship
privacy
data protection
Issue Date: Nov-2016
Date Deposited: 3-May-2016
Citation: Leleux C & Webster CWR (2016) The Sale of Edited Electoral Registers in Scotland: Implications for Privacy, Data Protection and Citizenship. Scottish Affairs, 25 (4), pp. 479-505. https://doi.org/10.3366/scot.2016.0153
Abstract: This article provides an assessment of the recent phenomenon in Scotland and the United Kingdom of selling edited electoral registers to third parties, and reflects on the implications of this practice for privacy, data protection and citizen-state relations. Drawing on the results of the National Survey of Electoral Registration Officers in Scotland, information is presented on the sale of edited registers, the types of organisation purchasing registers, revenues generated and the number of electors ‘opting out’ of the edited register. This is the first time such information has been collected nationally and therefore represents a unique Scottish ‘snapshot’. The article argues that the sale of edited registers is contentious. The collection of personal information contained within the register is critical for the successful functioning of elections and consequently our representative democratic system, yet the subsequent unrestricted sale of this information for commercial gain potentially undermines trust in democratic processes and alters the informational nature of citizen-state relations. This article offers a first opportunity to reflect on some of the consequences of this practice.
DOI Link: 10.3366/scot.2016.0153
Rights: [SCOT.2016.0153.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
[Scottish Affairsv1.0.pdf] Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Scottish Affairs by Edinburgh University Press. The final version of this publication is available at: http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/scot.2016.0153

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SCOT.2016.0153.pdfPublisher version201.43 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy
SCOT.2016.0153.pdfFulltext - Published Version201.43 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy
Scottish Affairsv1.0.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version785.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.