Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLintott, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorBunnefeld, Nils-
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, Philip-
dc.contributor.authorGajas, Roig Clara-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kirsty-
dc.description.abstractUrbanization is a key global driver in the modification of land use and has been linked to population declines even in widespread and relatively common species. Cities comprise a complex assortment of habitat types yet we know relatively little about the effects of their composition and spatial configuration on species distribution. Although many bat species exploit human resources, the majority of species are negatively impacted by urbanization. Here, we use data from the National Bat Monitoring Programme, a long-running citizen science scheme, to assess how two cryptic European bat species respond to the urban landscape. A total of 124×1km2sites throughout Britain were surveyed. The landscape surrounding each site was mapped and classified into discrete biotope types (e.g., woodland). Generalized linear models were used to assess differences in the response to the urban environment between the two species, and which landscape factors were associated with the distributions ofP.pipistrellusandP.pygmaeus. The relative prevalence ofP.pygmaeuscompared toP.pipistrelluswas greater in urban landscapes with a higher density of rivers and lakes, whereasP.pipistrelluswas frequently detected in landscapes comprising a high proportion of green space (e.g., parklands). AlthoughP.pipistrellusis thought to be well adapted to the urban landscape, we found a strong negative response to urbanization at a relatively local scale (1km), whilstP.pygmaeuswas detected more regularly in wooded urban landscapes containing freshwater. These results show differential habitat use at a landscape scale of two morphologically similar species, indicating that cryptic species may respond differently to anthropogenic disturbance. Even species considered relatively common and well adapted to the urban landscape may respond negatively to the built environment highlighting the future challenges involved in maintaining biodiversity within an increasingly urbanized world.en_UK
dc.relationLintott P, Barlow K, Bunnefeld N, Briggs P, Gajas Roig C & Park K (2016) Differential responses of cryptic bat species to the urban landscape, Ecology and Evolution, 6 (7), pp. 2044-2052.-
dc.rights© 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.subjectcryptic speciesen_UK
dc.subjectland useen_UK
dc.subjectpopulation trendsen_UK
dc.subjecturban ecologyen_UK
dc.titleDifferential responses of cryptic bat species to the urban landscapeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcology and Evolution-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirling-
dc.contributor.affiliationBat Conservation Trust-
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciences-
dc.contributor.affiliationBat Conservation Trust-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirling-
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ece31996.pdf430.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.