|dc.description.abstract||First paragraph: Casual inspection ofthe post-Keynesian literature, like other heterodox literatures, reveals an extent ofref erence to historical texts and analysis ofthe se texts that is unusual in modern economics, although not in earlier economic literature. The purpose ofthis essay is to provide an account ofthe part that history ofthought plays in post-Keynesian economics, and how history ofthought is understood within the school. I will argue that this understanding does not allow for history of thought to be fitted into dualistic categories, or indeed to be separated off from economics itself. While some have raised issue with post-Keynesian history ofthought by means ofthis attempt at posing distinctions, we will explore here how the post-Keynesian approach to history ofthought takes issue with the distinctions themselves.||en_UK|
|dc.publisher||Duke University Press||-|
|dc.relation||Dow S (2002) History of economic thought in the post-Keynesian tradition, History of Political Economy, 34 (Supplement 1), pp. 319-336.||-|
|dc.rights||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in History of Political Economy 2002 Volume 34, Number Suppl 1: 319-336 by Duke University Press. The original publication is available at: http://hope.dukejournals.org/content/34/Suppl_1/319.short||-|
|dc.title||History of economic thought in the post-Keynesian tradition||en_UK|
|dc.citation.jtitle||History of Political Economy||-|
|dc.type.status||Post-print (author final draft post-refereeing)||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.