Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22570
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTinch, Dugald-
dc.contributor.authorColombo, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorHanley, Nicholas-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T23:49:21Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/22570-
dc.description.abstractStatements of willingness to pay (WTP) have been shown to be dependent upon the framing of the hypothetical market. In this paper we investigate the effects of variations in the timing and location of choice experiment questions concerned with conservation of a UK national park, as research involving measurement of psychological well-being suggests potential differences for the same individual dependent upon when and where preferences are elicited. We apply the choice experiment technique to the valuation of changes in upland agricultural and semi-natural landscapes in the Peak District National Park in the UK, to investigate whether timing and location of elicitation (context) affects the value associated with changes in ecosystem services under different management regimes. Four treatments are employed – using the same sample of individuals answering the same choice scenarios – to measure WTPex-ante(off site),in situ(on site), and ex-post at two different time intervals (off site). We show that our on-site (in situ) treatment generates very different estimates of preferences than any of the off-site treatments. That stated preferences associated with environmental goods are so context dependent may have implications for the use of stated preferences in policy analysis in terms of identifying how environmental policy is funded and the divergence in value attributed to sampling different populations.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.relationTinch D, Colombo S & Hanley N (2015) The Impacts of Elicitation Context on Stated Preferences for Agricultural Landscapes, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66 (1), pp. 87-107.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectCost–benefit analysisen_UK
dc.subjectchoice experimentsen_UK
dc.subjectagricultural landscapesen_UK
dc.subjectpublic goodsen_UK
dc.subjectnational parksen_UK
dc.subjectcontext-dependent preferencesen_UK
dc.titleThe Impacts of Elicitation Context on Stated Preferences for Agricultural Landscapesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12080-
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Agricultural Economics-
dc.citation.issn0021-857X-
dc.citation.volume66-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.spage87-
dc.citation.epage107-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emaildugald.tinch@stir.ac.uk-
dc.citation.date03/08/2014-
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomics-
dc.contributor.affiliationIFAPA Centro Camino de Purchil-
dc.contributor.affiliationEconomics-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isi000347706900005-
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tinch_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Agricultural_Economics.pdf167.95 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.