Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22164
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDombrowski, Stephan Uen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Martinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMackintosh, Joan Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorGellert, Paulen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAraujo-Soares, Veraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Richard Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRodgers, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFord, Gary Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSniehotta, Falko Fen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-26T23:33:50Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-26T23:33:50Z-
dc.date.issued2015-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/22164-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The stroke awareness raising campaign ‘Act FAST' (Face, Arms, Speech: Time to call Emergency Medical Services) has been rolled out in multiple waves in England, but impact on stroke recognition and response remains unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test whether providing knowledge of the FAST acronym through a standard Act FAST campaign leaflet increases accurate recognition and response in stroke-based scenario measures. Methods: This is a population-based, cross-sectional survey of adults in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, sampled using the electoral register, with individuals randomized to receive a questionnaire and Act FAST leaflet (n = 2500) or a questionnaire only (n = 2500) in 2012. Campaign message retention, stroke recognition, and response measured through 16 scenario-based vignettes were assessed. Data were analyzed in 2013. Results: Questionnaire return rate was 32·3% (n = 1615). No differences were found between the leaflet and no-leaflet groups in return rate or demographics. Participants who received a leaflet showed better campaign recall (75·7% vs. 68·2%, P = 0·003) and recalled more FAST mnemonic elements (66·1% vs. 45·3% elements named correctly, P < 0·001). However, there were no between-group differences for stroke recognition and response to stroke-based scenarios (P > 0·05). Conclusions: Despite greater levels of recall of specific ‘Act FAST' elements among those receiving the Act FAST leaflet, there was no impact on stroke recognition and response measures.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationDombrowski SU, White M, Mackintosh JE, Gellert P, Araujo-Soares V, Thomson RG, Rodgers H, Ford GA & Sniehotta FF (2015) The stroke ‘Act FAST’ campaign: Remembered but not understood?. International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), pp. 324-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12353en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. 1 This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Dombrowski SU, White M, Mackintosh JE, Gellert P, Araujo-Soares V, Thomson RG, Rodgers H, Ford GA & Sniehotta FF (2015) The stroke ‘Act FAST’ campaign: Remembered but not understood?, International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), pp. 324-330., which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijs.12353/full. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.subjectacute stroke therapyen_UK
dc.subjectepidemiologyen_UK
dc.subjectinterventionen_UK
dc.subjectpreventionen_UK
dc.subjectstrokeen_UK
dc.subjectthrombolysisen_UK
dc.titleThe stroke ‘Act FAST’ campaign: Remembered but not understood?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2016-04-06en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[DASH 1 Randomised Evaluation of FAST leaflet paper IJStroke submission_revised_FINAL.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijs.12353en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid25130981en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Strokeen_UK
dc.citation.issn1747-4949en_UK
dc.citation.issn1747-4930en_UK
dc.citation.volume10en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage324en_UK
dc.citation.epage330en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emails.u.dombrowski@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date05/08/2014en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000351395300017en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84924757700en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid591525en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9832-2777en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-06-12en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-06-12en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2015-08-26en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDombrowski, Stephan U|0000-0001-9832-2777en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhite, Martin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMackintosh, Joan E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGellert, Paul|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAraujo-Soares, Vera|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThomson, Richard G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRodgers, Helen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFord, Gary A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSniehotta, Falko F|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-04-06en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2016-04-05en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2016-04-06|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameDASH 1 Randomised Evaluation of FAST leaflet paper IJStroke submission_revised_FINAL.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1747-4930en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DASH 1 Randomised Evaluation of FAST leaflet paper IJStroke submission_revised_FINAL.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version550.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.