Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22142
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Carolineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHavlicek, Janen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-09T02:08:34Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-09T02:08:34Z-
dc.date.issued2015-08-07en_UK
dc.identifier.other1115en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/22142-
dc.description.abstractPrevious research suggests that artificial fragrances may be chosen to complement or enhance an individual's body odor, rather than simply masking it, and that this may create an odor blend with an emergent quality that is perceptually distinguishable from body odor or fragrance alone. From this, it can be predicted that a new emergent odor might be more easily identified than an individual's body odor in isolation. We used a triangle test paradigm to assess whether fragrance affects people's ability to distinguish between individual odors. Six male and six female donors provided axillary odor samples in three conditions (without fragrance, wearing their own fragrance, and wearing an assigned fragrance). In total, 296 female and 131 male participants selected the odd one from three odor samples (two from one donor, one from another; both of the same sex). We found that participants could discriminate between the odors at above chance levels in all three odor conditions. Olfactory identification ability (measured using Sniffin' Sticks) positively predicted discrimination performance, and sex differences in performance were also observed, with female raters being correct more often than men. Success rates were also higher for odors of male donors. Additionally, while performance was above chance in all conditions, individual odor discrimination varied across the three conditions. Discrimination rate was significantly higher in the "no fragrance" condition than either of the fragranced conditions. Importantly, however, discrimination rate was also significantly higher in the "own fragrance" condition than the "assigned fragrance" condition, suggesting that naturally occurring variance in body odor is more preserved when blended with fragrances that people choose for themselves, compared with other fragrances. Our data are consistent with the idea that fragrance choices are influenced by fragrance interactions with an individual's own body odor.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.en_UK
dc.relationAllen C, Havlicek J & Roberts SC (2015) Effect of fragrance use on discrimination of individual body odor. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Art. No.: 1115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01115en_UK
dc.rights© 2015 Allen, Havlíček and Craig Roberts. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectdeodoranten_UK
dc.subjectolfactionen_UK
dc.subjectbody odoren_UK
dc.subjectidentificationen_UK
dc.subjecttriangle testen_UK
dc.subjectsmellen_UK
dc.titleEffect of fragrance use on discrimination of individual body odoren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01115en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid26300812en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFrontiers in Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1664-1078en_UK
dc.citation.volume6en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date07/08/2015en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000359800200001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84992344619en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid591932en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-07-20en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-07-20en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2015-08-20en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAllen, Caroline|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHavlicek, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2015-08-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2015-08-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameAllen_fpsyg-06-01115_2015.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Allen_fpsyg-06-01115_2015.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.