http://hdl.handle.net/1893/22135
Appears in Collections: | Accounting and Finance Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | What drives mandatory and voluntary risk reporting variations across Germany, UK and US? |
Author(s): | Elshandidy, Tamer Fraser, Ian Hussainey, Khaled |
Contact Email: | i.a.m.fraser@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Automated content analysis Firm and country characteristics Mandatory and voluntary risk reporting variations Repeated measures multilevel analysis |
Issue Date: | Dec-2015 |
Date Deposited: | 19-Aug-2015 |
Citation: | Elshandidy T, Fraser I & Hussainey K (2015) What drives mandatory and voluntary risk reporting variations across Germany, UK and US?. British Accounting Review, 47 (4), pp. 376-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.06.001 |
Abstract: | This paper utilises computerised textual analysis to explore the extent to which both firm and country characteristics influence mandatory and voluntary risk reporting (MRR and VRR) variations both within and between non-financial firms across Germany, the UK and the US, over the period from 2005 to 2010. We find significant variations in MRR and VRR between firms across the three countries. Further, we find, on average, that German firms tend to disclose significantly higher (lower) levels of risk information mandatorily than UK (US) firms. German firms, on average, tend to reveal considerably higher (lower) levels of VRR than US (UK) firms. Our results document that MRR and VRR variations are significantly influenced by systematic risk, the legal system and cultural values. We also find that country and firm characteristics have higher explanatory power over the observed variations in MRR than over those in VRR. |
DOI Link: | 10.1016/j.bar.2014.06.001 |
Rights: | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. |
Licence URL(s): | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Elshandidy et al_BAR_2014.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 906.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo until 2999-12-21 Request a copy |
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.