Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Managing climate change in conservation practice: an exploration of the science-management interface in beech forest management
Author(s): de Koning, Jessica
Turnhout, Esther
Winkel, Georg
Blondet, Marieke
Borras, Lars
Ferranti, Francesca
Geitzenauer, Maria
Sotirov, Metodi
Jump, Alistair
Contact Email:
Keywords: Climate change
Forest management
Natura 2000
Science management interface
Knowledge utilization
Issue Date: Dec-2014
Date Deposited: 10-Jul-2015
Citation: de Koning J, Turnhout E, Winkel G, Blondet M, Borras L, Ferranti F, Geitzenauer M, Sotirov M & Jump A (2014) Managing climate change in conservation practice: an exploration of the science-management interface in beech forest management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23 (14), pp. 3657-3671.
Abstract: Scientific studies reveal significant consequences of climate change for nature, from ecosystems to individual species. Such studies are important factors in policy decisions on forest conservation and management in Europe. However, while research has shown that climate change research start to impact on European conservation policies like Natura 2000, climate change information has yet to translate into management practices. This article contributes to the on-going debates about science-society relations and knowledge utilization by exploring and analysing the interface between scientific knowledge and forest management practice. We focus specifically on climate change debates in conservation policy and on how managers of forest areas in Europe perceive and use climate change ecology. Our findings show that forest managers do not necessarily deny the potential importance of climate change for their management practices, at least in the future, but have reservations about the current usefulness of available knowledge for their own areas and circumstances. This suggests that the science-management interface is not as politicized as current policy debates about climate change and that the use of climate change ecology is situated in practice. We conclude the article by discussing what forms of knowledge may enable responsible and future oriented management in practice focusing specifically on the role of reflexive experimentation and monitoring.
DOI Link: 10.1007/s10531-014-0781-8
Rights: This article is open-access. Open access publishing allows free access to and distribution of published articles where the author retains copyright of their work by employing a Creative Commons attribution licence. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Biodiversity Conservation_2015.pdfFulltext - Published Version233.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.