Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21915
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Anthonyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJones, Benedict Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFeinberg, David Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorPerrett, David Ien_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-16T23:13:09Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-16T23:13:09Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21915-
dc.description.abstractSeveral evolutionarily relevant sources of individual differences in face preference have been documented for women. Here, we examine three such sources of individual variation in men's preference for female facial femininity: term of relationship, partnership status and self-perceived attractiveness. We show that men prefer more feminine female faces when rating for a short-term relationship and when they have a partner (Study 1). These variables were found to interact in a follow-up study (Study 2). Men who thought themselves attractive also preferred more feminized female faces for short-term relationships than men who thought themselves less attractive (Study 1 and Study 2). In women, similar findings for masculine preferences in male faces have been interpreted as adaptive. In men, such preferences potentially reflect that attractive males are able to compete for high-quality female partners in short-term contexts. When a man has secured a mate, the potential cost of being discovered may increase his choosiness regarding short-term partners relative to unpartnered men, who can better increase their short-term mating success by relaxing their standards. Such potentially strategic preferences imply that men also face trade-offs when choosing relatively masculine or feminine faced partners. In line with a trade-off, women with feminine faces were seen as more likely to be unfaithful and more likely to pursue short-term relationships (Study 3), suggesting that risk of cuckoldry is one factor that may limit men's preferences for femininity in women and could additionally lead to preferences for femininity in short-term mates.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationLittle A, Jones BC, Feinberg DR & Perrett DI (2014) Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces. British Journal of Psychology, 105 (3), pp. 364-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12043en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Little A, Jones BC, Feinberg DR & Perrett DI (2014) Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces, British Journal of Psychology, 105 (3), pp. 364-381, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12043/full. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.titleMen's strategic preferences for femininity in female facesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2016-10-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Little_14_male_sra_BJP_STORRE.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 24 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bjop.12043en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBritish Journal of Psychologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-8295en_UK
dc.citation.issn0007-1269en_UK
dc.citation.volume105en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage364en_UK
dc.citation.epage381en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailanthony.little@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMcMaster Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000339437100005en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84904046782en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid596948en_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-06-22en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-06-22en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2015-06-16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLittle, Anthony|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Benedict C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFeinberg, David R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPerrett, David I|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-10-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2016-09-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2016-10-01|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameLittle_14_male_sra_BJP_STORRE.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0007-1269en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Little_14_male_sra_BJP_STORRE.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version610.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.