Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21652
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTinsley, Richard Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCoxhead, Peter Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStott, Lucy Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTinsley, M Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPiccinni, Maya Zen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGuille, Matthew Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T03:08:27Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-16T03:08:27Z-
dc.date.issued2015-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21652-
dc.description.abstractThe chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is notorious amongst current conservation biology challenges, responsible for mass mortality and extinction of amphibian species. World trade in amphibians is implicated in global dissemination. Exports of South African Xenopus laevis have led to establishment of this invasive species on four continents. Bd naturally infects this host in Africa and now occurs in several introduced populations. However, no previous studies have investigated transfer of infection into co-occurring native amphibian faunas. A survey of 27 U.K. institutions maintaining X. laevis for research showed that most laboratories have low-level infection, a risk for native species if animals are released into the wild. RT-PCR assays showed Bd in two introduced U.K. populations of X. laevis, in Wales and Lincolnshire. Laboratory and field studies demonstrated that infection levels increase with stress, especially low temperature. In the U.K., native amphibians may be exposed to intense transmission in spring when they enter ponds to spawn alongside X. laevis that have cold-elevated Bd infections. Exposure to cross-infection has probably been recurrent since the introduction of X. laevis, >20years in Lincolnshire and 50years in Wales. These sites provide an important test for assessing the impact of X. laevis on Bd spread. However, RT-PCR assays on 174 native amphibians (Bufo, Rana, Lissotriton and Triturus spp.), sympatric with the Bd-infected introduced populations, showed no foci of self-sustaining Bd transmission associated with X. laevis. The abundance of these native amphibians suggested no significant negative population-level effect after the decades of co-occurrence.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationTinsley RC, Coxhead PG, Stott LC, Tinsley MC, Piccinni MZ & Guille MJ (2015) Chytrid fungus infections in laboratory and introduced Xenopus laevis populations: assessing the risks for U.K. native amphibians. Biological Conservation, 184, pp. 380-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.034en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectAfrican clawed frogen_UK
dc.subjectChytrid fungus (Bd)en_UK
dc.subjectEmerging infectious disease (EID)en_UK
dc.subjectGlobal spread of pathogensen_UK
dc.subjectInvasive speciesen_UK
dc.subjectThreats to native speciesen_UK
dc.titleChytrid fungus infections in laboratory and introduced Xenopus laevis populations: assessing the risks for U.K. native amphibiansen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.034en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBiological Conservationen_UK
dc.citation.issn0006-3207en_UK
dc.citation.volume184en_UK
dc.citation.spage380en_UK
dc.citation.epage388en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmt18@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date04/03/2015en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bristolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Portsmouthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bristolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Portsmouthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Portsmouthen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000353007200041en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84924193791en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid604177en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7715-1259en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-01-31en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-01-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2015-04-13en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorTinsley, Richard C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCoxhead, Peter G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStott, Lucy C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTinsley, M C|0000-0002-7715-1259en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPiccinni, Maya Z|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGuille, Matthew J|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2015-04-13en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2015-04-13|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameTinsley_Biological Conservation_2015.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0006-3207en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tinsley_Biological Conservation_2015.pdfFulltext - Published Version622.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.