|dc.description.abstract||Hogg's Confessions was fiercely criticised by the Edinburgh post-Enlightenment literati who considered his writing unsophisticated. A literary-pragmatic investigation, however, reveals Hogg's strategic use of conversational principles through which he conveys additional, subversive meanings. Politeness theories, in fact, demonstrate that Hogg's Confessions may have been perceived as a Face Threatening Act against the positive face of bourgeois women. A cognitive approach based on relevance theory, on the other hand, admits the simultaneous validity of both the psychological and supernatural interpretations of the character Gil-Martin. Indeed, Hogg consistently flouts the maxim of Manner as described in Grice's Cooperative Principle, thus creating areas of ambiguity which readers interpret in accordance with their personal cognitive environment.||en_UK|
|dc.relation||Leonardi B (2011) The Pragmatics of Literary Interaction in James Hogg’s The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner In: Kaufhold K, McCulloch S, Tominc A (ed.) Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching, Lancaster: Lancaster University. LAEL PG 2010: Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 5.7.2010 - 5.7.2010, Lancaster, pp. 92-108.||-|
|dc.relation.ispartofseries||Papers from LAEL PG 2010, 5||-|
|dc.rights||Publisher is open-access. Open access publishing allows free access to and distribution of published articles where the author retains copyright of their work by employing a Creative Commons attribution licence. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given.||-|
|dc.title||The Pragmatics of Literary Interaction in James Hogg’s The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner||en_UK|
|dc.type.status||Book Chapter: publisher version||-|
|dc.citation.btitle||Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching||-|
|dc.citation.conferencename||LAEL PG 2010: Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Literature and Languages Conference Papers and Proceedings|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.