Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21513
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJarnemo, Andersen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMinderman, Jeroenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBunnefeld, Nilsen_UK
dc.contributor.authorZidar, Josefinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMansson, Johanen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-18T23:12:58Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-18T23:12:58Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08en_UK
dc.identifier.other97en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21513-
dc.description.abstractDeer (Cervidae) cause considerable damage to forest plantations, crops, and protected habitats. The most common response to this damage is to implement strategies to lower population densities. However, lowering deer density may not always be desirable from hunting, recreational, or conservation perspectives. Therefore, knowledge is needed about additional factors beyond deer density that affect damage levels, and management actions that consider competing management goals. We studied the relationships between levels of bark-stripping by red deer (Cervus elaphus) on Norway spruce (Picea abies) and (1) relative deer density indices (pellet group count and deer harvest data), (2) availability of alternative natural forage (cover of forage species) and (3) proportion forest in the landscape, both at a forest stand scale and at a landscape scale. Extensive variation in damage level was evident between the six study areas. On a stand scale, the proportion of spruce damaged was positively related to pellet group density, indicating the importance of local deer usage of stands. In addition, available alternative forage in the field layer within spruce stands and proportion forest surrounding stands was negatively related to damage level. On the landscape scale, damage level was negatively related to availability of forage in the field and shrub layers and proportion forest, but was not related to any of the relative deer density indices. Increasing alternative forage may thus decrease damage and thereby reduce conflicts. Additionally, the proportion of forest in the landscape affects damage levels and should thus be considered in landscape planning and when forecasting damage risk. The relationship between local deer usage of stands and damage level suggests that future studies should try to separate the effects of local deer usage and deer density.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_UK
dc.relationJarnemo A, Minderman J, Bunnefeld N, Zidar J & Mansson J (2014) Managing landscapes for multiple objectives: alternative forage can reduce the conflict between deer and forestry. Ecosphere, 5 (8), Art. No.: 97. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00106.1en_UK
dc.rights© 2014 Jarnemo et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCervus elaphusen_UK
dc.subjectdeer managementen_UK
dc.subjectforest damageen_UK
dc.subjecthabitat fragmentationen_UK
dc.subjectlandscape structureen_UK
dc.subjectland use conflictsen_UK
dc.subjectlarge herbivoresen_UK
dc.subjectNorway spruceen_UK
dc.subjectPicea abiesen_UK
dc.subjectred deeren_UK
dc.subjectungulatesen_UK
dc.titleManaging landscapes for multiple objectives: alternative forage can reduce the conflict between deer and forestryen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/ES14-00106.1en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcosphereen_UK
dc.citation.issn2150-8925en_UK
dc.citation.issn2150-8925en_UK
dc.citation.volume5en_UK
dc.citation.issue8en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailjeroen.minderman1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwedish University of Agricultural Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLinkoping Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSwedish University of Agricultural Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000345096900004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84924342384en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid607592en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8451-5540en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1349-4463en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-06-13en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2015-02-18en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Minderman_ESA_2014.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.