Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21320
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Stephanieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kirstyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-16T23:10:43Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-16T23:10:43Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2012-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21320-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates alternative approaches to locating bumble bee nests for scientific research. We present results from three trials designed to assess: 1. The comparative efficiency of two detection dogs; 2. The ability of a dog to locate nests when carrying out repeat searches of agricultural habitats through the season; 3. The efficiency of a dog compared with human volunteers at finding nests in woodland, with the human volunteers using two methods: ‘fixed searches’ and ‘free searches’. The two dogs varied in their efficiency in finding buried portions of bumble bee nest material (62.5% and 100% correct indications). Searching for real nests in rural habitats, a detection dog located nine nests of four bumble bee species, in a range of habitats, at a rate of one nest for 19 h 24 min of searching time. A comparison of ‘free searches’ using human volunteers and the dog in woodland found that they located nests at similar rates, one nest for 1 h 20 min of searching time. Fixed searches located nests more slowly (one nest for 3 h 18 min of searching time), but probably provide a reliable estimate of nest density. Experienced volunteers performed no better than novices. Given the investment required to train and maintain a detection dog, we conclude that this is not a cost effective method for locating bumble bee nests. If the aim is to estimate density, then fixed searches are appropriate, whereas if the aim is to find many nests, free searches using volunteers provide the most cost effective methoden_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherIBRA - International Bee Research Associationen_UK
dc.relationO'Connor S, Park K & Goulson D (2012) Humans versus dogs; a comparison of methods for the detection of bumble bee nests. Journal of Apicultural Research, 51 (2), pp. 204-211. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.51.2.09en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.subjectBombusen_UK
dc.subjectnest densityen_UK
dc.subjectnest locationen_UK
dc.subjectpublic surveyen_UK
dc.subjectdetection dogen_UK
dc.titleHumans versus dogs; a comparison of methods for the detection of bumble bee nestsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-30en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[OConnor2012.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3896/IBRA.1.51.2.09en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Apicultural Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn2078-6913en_UK
dc.citation.issn0021-8839en_UK
dc.citation.volume51en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage204en_UK
dc.citation.epage211en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderThe Leverhulme Trusten_UK
dc.author.emailk.j.park@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000302295500009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84859762796en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid790176en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6080-7197en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-12-16en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectNesting Ecology of Bumblebees revealed by sniffer dog detection of nestsen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefF/00 241/Ken_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OConnor2012.pdfFulltext - Published Version622.91 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-30    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.