Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21064
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Malley, Claire-
dc.contributor.authorLangton, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Anne H-
dc.contributor.authorDoherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth-
dc.contributor.authorBruce, Vicki-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-06T05:19:40Z-
dc.date.issued1996-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/21064-
dc.description.abstractA series of experiments are reported in which pairs of subjects performed a collaborative task remotely and communicated either via video and audio links or audio links only. Using the same task (the ‘map task'), Boyle et al. (1994) found clear benefits of seeing the face compared with audio-only co-present interaction. Pairs who could see each other needed to say less to achieve the same level of performance as pairs who could only hear each other. In contrast to these findings, in all three experiments reported here, users of video links produced longer and more interrupted dialogues than those who had audio links only, although there were no differences in performance. Performance was affected when the video links were of low bandwidth, resulting in transmission delays. The drop in accuracy was correlated with a significant increase in levels of interrupted speech. We also compared the structure of dialogues and the use of gaze in high-quality video-mediated communication with those produced in face-to-face co-present interactions. Results show that both face-to-face and video-mediated speakers use visual cues to check for mutual understanding. When they cannot see each other such checks need to be conducted verbally, accounting for the length effect in dialogues. However, despite using visual cues in the same way as face-to-face speakers, video does not provide the same advantage of shorter and less interrupted dialogues. In addition, users of video gaze far more overall than face-to-face speakers. We suggest that when speakers are not physically co-present they are less confident in general that they have mutual understanding, even though they can see their interlocutors, and therefore over-compensate by increasing the level of both verbal and nonverbal information.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationO'Malley C, Langton S, Anderson AH, Doherty-Sneddon G & Bruce V (1996) Comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated interaction, Interacting with Computers, 8 (2), pp. 177-192.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectcomputer-supported cooperative worken_UK
dc.subjectvideo-mediated communicationen_UK
dc.subjectvideo conferencingen_UK
dc.titleComparison of face-to-face and video-mediated interactionen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(96)01027-2-
dc.citation.jtitleInteracting with Computers-
dc.citation.issn0953-5438-
dc.citation.volume8-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.spage177-
dc.citation.epage192-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailsrhl1@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottingham-
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychology-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgow-
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychology-
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychology-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isiA1996VL01200005-
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OMalley_1996_PubVersion.pdf1.24 MBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.