|dc.description.abstract||Five experiments are reported that investigate the distribution of selective attention to verbal and nonverbal components of an utterance when conflicting information exists in these channels. A Stroop-type interference paradigm is adopted in which attributes from the verbal and nonverbal dimensions are placed into conflict. Static directional (deictic) gestures and corresponding spoken and written words show symmetrical interference (Experiments 1, 2, and 3), as do directional arrows and spoken words (Experiment 4). This symmetry is maintained when the task is switched from a manual keypress to a verbal naming response (Experiment 5), suggesting the mutual influence of the 2 dimensions is independent of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. It is concluded that the results are consistent with a model of interference in which information from pointing gestures and speech is integrated prior to the response selection stage of processing.||en_UK|
|dc.publisher||American Psychological Association||-|
|dc.relation||Langton S, O'Malley C & Bruce V (1996) Actions speak no louder than words: Symmetrical cross-modal interference effects in the processing of verbal and gestural information, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22 (6), pp. 1357-1375.||-|
|dc.rights||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. Published in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance by American Psychological Association. The original publication is available at: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/22/6/1357/||-|
|dc.title||Actions speak no louder than words: Symmetrical cross-modal interference effects in the processing of verbal and gestural information||en_UK|
|dc.citation.jtitle||Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance||-|
|dc.type.status||Post-print (author final draft post-refereeing)||-|
|dc.contributor.affiliation||University of Nottingham||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.