Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/20889
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSkar, Silje-
dc.contributor.authorSniehotta, Falko F-
dc.contributor.authorMolloy, Gerard-
dc.contributor.authorPrestwich, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorAraujo-Soares, Vera-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-15T18:11:15Z-
dc.date.issued2011-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/20889-
dc.description.abstractBrief planning interventions, usually delivered within paper and pencil questionnaires, have been found to be effective in changing health behaviours. Using a double-blind randomised controlled trial, this study examined the efficacy of two types of planning interventions (action plans and coping plans) in increasing physical activity levels when they are delivered via the internet. Following the completion of self-reported physical activity (primary outcome) and theory of planned behaviour (TPB) measures at baseline, students (N = 1273) were randomised into one of four conditions on the basis of a 2 (received instructions to form action plans or not) × 2 (received instructions to form coping plans or not) factorial design. Physical activity (primary outcome) and TPB measures were completed again at two-month follow-up. An objective measure (attendance at the university's sports facilities) was employed 6 weeks after a follow-up for a duration of 13 weeks (secondary outcome). The interventions did not change self-reported physical activity, attendance at campus sports facilities or TPB measures. This might be due to low adherence to the intervention protocol (ranging from 58.8 to 76.7%). The results of this study suggest that the planning interventions under investigation are ineffective in changing behaviour when delivered online to a sample of participants unaware of the allocation to different conditions. Possible moderators of the effectiveness of planning interventions in changing health behaviours are discussed.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis-
dc.relationSkar S, Sniehotta FF, Molloy G, Prestwich A & Araujo-Soares V (2011) Do brief online planning interventions increase physical activity amongst university students? A randomised controlled trial, Psychology and Health, 26 (4), pp. 399-417.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectcomputer-based interventionen_UK
dc.subjectphysical activityen_UK
dc.subjectrandomised controlled trialen_UK
dc.subjectplanning interventionsen_UK
dc.subjectadherence to intervention protocolen_UK
dc.titleDo brief online planning interventions increase physical activity amongst university students? A randomised controlled trialen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870440903456877-
dc.citation.jtitlePsychology and Health-
dc.citation.issn0887-0446-
dc.citation.volume26-
dc.citation.issue4-
dc.citation.spage399-
dc.citation.epage417-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailg.j.molloy@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHP Research-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeen-
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychology-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leeds-
dc.contributor.affiliationRobert Gordon University-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isi000289243600002-
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Psychology and Health 2011.pdf541.19 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.